Actually, I hear this not as a direct one-for-one replacement based on some specific position but as one of total numbers across the entire government workforce - which I think I’d agree with. I’m not a supporter of hers, but I can understand what she’s saying.
To me, this would force the government to decide what part of its workforce it values the most and make them go through the actions to counteract the attrition of needed functions. To me this would begin to erase the “government job entitlement” practice that has happened these last few decades.
We know who they value least: soldiers