It has been a few years since I watched her do interviews.
My impression was that it was more about her than her guests.
Don’t get me wrong, I am a lot more lenient with her in her show, than I would be in a debate of presidential contenders.
There is a place for contemporary discussion of certain issues, that have no place in a debate.
Once those issues are a month or so old, they’ve ready been beaten to death.
Trump was asked to talk about the Rosie issue over and over again when it took place.
Now here we are 18 months to two years later, and Kelly was lofting it again. Enough already. She didn’t know that?
So I can’t cut Kelly slack here. This was so sophomoric.
When I watched her show, it didn’t seem to me she was all that intellectually gifted. You don’t have to be, if you treat people decent. She doesn’t always do that. And I believe that Trump probably has a point, that she’s bluffs her way along more than she should.
When folks suggested it was all about her and making a name for herself, vs drawing out the candidate’s inner thoughts, it sounded like the Kelly I remembered.
good points!
Thanks.