“Who decided what “wherever” means something hormonal?”
Who? A lot of people that can’t grasp that they have been subtly and completely brainwashed by media hogwash for decades. Even those who consider themselves Conservative will fall for these “bells” of feminist garbage like Pavlov’s dogs.
If one believes in free speech instead of just giving it lip service like so many so-called Conservatives; there is no “off limits” to what one can say. There isn’t a word in the dictionary that some nutjob wouldn’t be offended by. That’s why all this pc nonsense is just that; nonsense and it has no end.
Megyn Kelly is a hard-nosed, irreverent, snide, sometimes vulgar person. She whines about insults to feminism while openly insulting all that is feminine by just being who she is and demanding special treatment and concessions just because she’s a woman. True to form, slavering trained seals like Fitz drop and give her what she and her cohorts want. Dazed and confused, they insert words where they weren’t spoken and attribute statements to the wrong people because they know that millions like them will hear the “bells” and react just the way the media hypnotists want them to.
Donald Trump and Megyn Kelly are cut of the same cloth. One is angling for a career boost that the other has already achieved many times over. If ruthlessness is considered an admirable trait in a news anchoress; why not in a Presidential candidate? In Trump and Kelly’s case, the only difference is that one is unapologetic(that’s why Trump is being admired) and one is underhanded and expects special treatment when she demands it.
Men,have been effectively de-manned by the media and society; trained in their responses to the point of reflex.
“Blood coming out of her wherever?” According to Liberal, pc, Megyn Kelly doesn’t have a “wherever” that should be a consideration for anything she does. It’s all relative. If Donald Trump has to check his “wherever” and “whatevers”, then so should Megyn Kelly.
I don't agree with everything in your post (Trump and Kelly cut from the same cloth? really? I think not!), but I do agree with this. And you said it well.
Agreed.
But, that means that, IMHO, they're both sharks, so neither of them should expect to be coddled.
If his "blood" comment was the reference that so many people seem to believe it was, then he would deserve the criticism. The issue isn't about men vs. women. If a female candidate publicly criticized a journalist by making a reference to a male body part - or if MK made a comment about Trump's body part - she would be rightly criticized.
It's just that there's no proof that Trump's thought process was going in the direction that people believe it was with that "blood" comment. And now he himself is saying that his comment was misunderstood. But the press is never going to let it go now.