Skip to comments.
Cracks in the cable business send media stocks tumbling
washingtoncompost ^
| August 7 2015
| Thad Moore
Posted on 08/07/2015 7:11:00 PM PDT by 867V309
Media companies were slammed on Wall Street this week as investors grew increasingly fearful that even industry giants would be swamped by the rising tide of cord-cutting consumers and the ebb of traditional television viewing.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: cableindustry; cutthecabloe; mediaindostry; mediastocks; roku; stockmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: cblue55
Cut my cable last Saturday, just in time to miss the FOX debate. No regrets.
I had to listen to it on foxnews radio on my ROKU. Frankly, you don't miss much by cutting.
21
posted on
08/07/2015 7:58:49 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: adorno
Arent the internet service providers the same as those that provide the cable TV services? You raise an interesting question. But in my neck of the woods, I have exactly two choices for cable TV. But I have at least four choices for Internet. And there might even be more.
I'm not quite sure which Internet provider uses what cable system. But I'm guessing (hoping) Internet competition will keep prices down.
22
posted on
08/07/2015 8:03:18 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: 867V309
Thats a lot of ifs.
There are no 'ifs' about who owns the cable and internet services.
So, the 'ifs' lead to one conclusion, which I've already stated.
23
posted on
08/07/2015 8:05:13 PM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: adorno
True, but cable companies lose ad revenue with fewer viewers. Also, cable providers create content, and bundle lefty garbage that no one would pay for if cable channels were bought a la carte. CNN, MSNBc, MTV would likely disappear if people weren't forced to buy them as part of cable channel packages.
for me, i just didn't find anything worth watching; certainly nothing worth $113/mo. I stopped caring about sports, got my news and weather on my phone, and didn't feel like funding the garbage like Real Housewives, Teen Mom, or Naked Dating. I just read books now.
24
posted on
08/07/2015 8:05:32 PM PDT
by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
To: Steely Tom
Time Warmer cable cannot justify raising the cable rates of near 35% in 2 and a half years. $101 to 137 and no movie channels.
Switch to Netflix, ROKU and Sling TV and over the air tv.
To: 867V309
We have Direct TV. Like it, but it is expensive. Haven’t done much research on how to cut ties with them.
What should I know and do?
To: adorno
So, the 'ifs' lead to one conclusion, which I've already stated.
Not really.
IP bandwidth and cable tv are two different services. Your assumption that an IP can just jack-up prices to make up for lost cable tv revenue is wrong.
27
posted on
08/07/2015 8:13:02 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: SeaHawkFan
We have Direct TV. Like it, but it is expensive. Havent done much research on how to cut ties with them.
What should I know and do?
If you know someone who has cut the cable or owns ROKU or similar device, ask them. Google "cut the cable." then when you have questions, come back here.
28
posted on
08/07/2015 8:20:12 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: 867V309
BREAKING NEWS
29
posted on
08/07/2015 8:34:40 PM PDT
by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: 867V309
Yes.....we will not win this though. They will next limit how much streaming we can do a month and they will raise the internet rates. I decided not to get a landline when I moved into a new house last year and just got cable and internet and the price is more then what it was with all 3.......the companies will always find ways to charge us. Don’t underestimate them. If you think we will win in the end then you are wrong.
30
posted on
08/07/2015 8:35:58 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
To: Leaning Right
Those kids go with Internet streaming.
Yeah until they cap how much streaming we can do a month.....it is coming.
31
posted on
08/07/2015 8:36:44 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
To: adorno
Bingo.....I CAN’T believe that people think they are going to beat the cable companies.....lol. naive beyond belief.
32
posted on
08/07/2015 8:38:52 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
To: SeaHawkFan
Don’t do what I did.
I called them to cancel. I could have gotten out scott free.
They sweetened the deal, said that I could try xxx amount of other channels for free for a month.
I said yes, and the channels were immediately added.
A couple days later a new subscriber agreement arrives in the mail, I now have a new deal with DirecTv.
Long story short, $150, and two weeks later, I was out.
33
posted on
08/07/2015 8:45:38 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: 867V309
I cancelled cable more than a year ago and it didn’t take long to get used to it. I get more channels than I have time to watch. Granted, I live in Houston so there are lots of free channels. I’ve also discovered that some of the best dramas are on PBS from England. And I’ve yet to see any that make political statements.
The straw that broke the camel’s back was Comcast kept raising the rates. I still have their internet and they’re charging me $52 a month. I’ve checked and can’t find any that’s cheaper for my neighborhood. They seem to have a monopoly. If they start raising the rate I will simple start using my Consumer Cellular phone for my internet.
34
posted on
08/07/2015 10:14:39 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(Since you're so much smarter than me, don't waste your time insulting me. I won't understand it.)
To: VerySadAmerican
I still have their internet and theyre charging me $52 a month.
I pay 58 for internet only with "Bright"house. It's a monopoly for sure, how politicians get rich.
35
posted on
08/07/2015 10:22:40 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: MrEdd
No television since March of 1995. Im a pioneer.No TV since 1980. What does that make me?
the infowarrior
To: infowarrior
Everyone have a look at the Kobi app. Slip stream that into a Amazon Fire TV box. Add high speed internet and I understand you will get all cable programming. A bit technical to get it up and running (I haven’t tried it yet) but sounds worth the effort.
37
posted on
08/08/2015 3:35:58 AM PDT
by
DAC21
(.z)
To: 867V309
Adorno is correct you even have providers like dish now offering TV streaming 20 channels for $20 a month. You will still pay for content you will just subsidise less crap content like MSNBC but pay a premium for what you actually want to see.
38
posted on
08/08/2015 7:55:23 AM PDT
by
edzo4
(You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
To: 867V309
IP bandwidth and cable tv are two different services. Your assumption that an IP can just jack-up prices to make up for lost cable tv revenue is wrong.
The signals come in on the same 'wire', no, they are not separate services.
Plus, an ISP has a right to charge a customer, depending on amount of bandwidth used. So, if a person's internet activity goes up, while his TV usage drops, it's only 'fair' that an ISP might charge more for the additional internet 'traffic' arriving at a person's end. It will happen once the cable companies start taking major hits to their revenue.
39
posted on
08/08/2015 6:48:06 PM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: adorno
The signals come in on the same 'wire', no, they are not separate services.
If they weren't separate services you wouldn't be able to buy them separately.
40
posted on
08/08/2015 6:58:56 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson