Didn't read the whole of my post, did you? I explained my reasoning.
Again - if the Luntz group's results were genuine, they'd be in close alignmnent with the vast majority of post-debate opinion and polls.
They aren't. Not by a long shot, i.e., something's fishy.
So your position is that snap polls on the internet are more accurate than real time focus group reaction tracking?
No wonder you know so much about Nigerian scammers...