Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama v. Bibi -- Fight to the Finish (Barf?)
Townhall.com ^ | August 7, 2015 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 08/07/2015 7:13:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

In his desperation to sink the Iran nuclear deal, Bibi Netanyahu is taking a hellish gamble.

Israel depends upon the United States for $3 billion a year in military aid and diplomatic cover in forums where she is often treated like a pariah state. Israel has also been the beneficiary of almost all the U.S. vetoes in the Security Council.

America is indispensable to Israel. The reverse is not true.

Yet, without telling the White House, Bibi had his U.S. ambassador arrange for him to address a joint session of Congress in March -- to rip up the president's Iran nuclear deal before it was even completed.

The day the deal was signed, using what The Washington Post calls "stark apocalyptic language," Bibi accused John Kerry of giving the mullahs a "sure path to a nuclear weapon" and a "cash bonanza of hundreds of billions of dollars ... to pursue its aggression and terror."

Bibi has since inspired and led the campaign to get Congress to kill the deal, the altarpiece of the Obama presidency.

Israel Ambassador Ron Dermer, a former Republican operative now cast in the role of "Citizen Genet," has intensively lobbied the Hill to get Congress to pass a resolution of rejection.

If that resolution passes, as it appears it will, Obama will veto it.

Then Israel, the Israeli lobby AIPAC, and all its allies and auxiliaries in the think tanks and on op-ed pages will conduct a full-court press to have Congress override the Obama veto and kill his nuclear deal.

Has Bibi, have the Israelis, considered what would happen should they succeed? Certainly, there would be rejoicing in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and Bibi would be crowned King of Capitol Hill.

But they will have humiliated an American president by crushing him by two-to-one in his own legislature. Such a defeat could break the Obama presidency and force the resignation of John Kerry, who would have become a laughing stock in international forums.

The message would go out to the world. In any clash between the United States and Israel over U.S. policy in the Middle East, bet on Bibi. Bet on Israel. America is Israel's poodle now.

With the Gulf nations having joined Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia in backing the deal, Israel is isolated in its opposition. And, two weeks ago, Kerry warned that if Congress rejects the deal, "Israel could end up being more isolated and more blamed."

Hardly an outrageous remark.

Yet, Israel's ex-ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren fairly dripped condescension and contempt in his retort: "The threat of the secretary of state who, in the past, warned that Israel was in danger of being an apartheid state, cannot deter us from fulfilling our national duty to oppose this dangerous deal."

But this is not Israel's deal. It is our deal, and our decision. And Israel is massively interfering in our internal affairs to scuttle a deal the president believes is in the vital interests of the United States.

When the U.S. and Israel disagree over U.S. policy in the Mideast, who decides for America? Them or us?

Why does Barack Obama take this? Why does John Kerry take this?

One can only imagine what President Eisenhower would have done had he seen Bibi at the rostrum of the U.S. House of Representatives, ripping apart his Middle East policy. Or had Ike learned that an Israeli ambassador was working the halls of Congress to kill an arms deal he and John Foster Dulles had just negotiated.

Lest we forget, Ike told his wartime colleague, Prime Minister Anthony Eden, to get his army out of Suez or he would sink the British pound. Ike then told Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to get his army out of Sinai or face U.S. economic reprisals.

Eden and Ben-Gurion did as they were told.

That was an America respected by friend and foe alike.

When Harry Truman felt that Gen. Douglas MacArthur had been insubordinate in resisting presidential restrictions on his actions in Korea, Truman fired the general and astounded the nation.

Yet this president and John Kerry have been wimpishly seeking for weeks to placate Netanyahu. And Bibi is no Douglas MacArthur.

Time to stop acting like wusses.

The president should declare Dermer persona non grata and send him packing, then tell the Israeli government we will discuss a new arms package when you have a prime minister who understands that no nation interferes in the internal affairs of the United States. None.

That could bring Bibi's government, with its single-vote majority, crashing down. And why not? After all, Bibi was a virtual surrogate for Mitt Romney when Mitt was trying to bring down Obama.

Obama and Kerry are never running again. Deep down, they would surely relish taking Bibi down. And they could do it.


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel
KEYWORDS: antisemitebuchanan; benjaminnetanyahu; irandeal; middleeast; nuclearweapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: tbpiper

I know what you mean. It is so bad that even Michael Savage I understand no longer has any use for Pat. I remember when Savage spent kissing Pat’s rear.


21 posted on 08/07/2015 9:28:35 AM PDT by Jean2 (ox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Such a defeat could break the Obama presidency and force the resignation of John Kerry, who would have become a laughing stock in international forums.

Win, win...Obama is a terrible President and Kerry resigning would make me sleep better at night...

22 posted on 08/07/2015 12:50:51 PM PDT by BerniesFriend (Sarah Palin-"Lord knows she's attractive" says bitter Andrea Mitchell and the rest of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

All that dependence on American Aid isn’t worth anything at when America is conniving with Iran to extinguish Israel.


23 posted on 08/08/2015 4:57:17 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Our Sunni Sultan wants Iran to have Nuclear weapons so that Iran will attack Israel and be itself destroyed by the return fire that will come even if Tel Aviv and Haifa are incinerated. That is killing two chickens with one swipe of the axe.


24 posted on 08/08/2015 4:59:46 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Excellent insight!


25 posted on 08/08/2015 5:11:06 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("All the time live the truth with love in your heart." ~Fr. Ho Lung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Yes. The deal is already done no matter how the Congress handles it. The deal Itself makes war with Iran inevitable. Either we and Israel bomb Iran or we prevent Israel from bombing Iran which leads to the Iranian nuke attack on Israel and the retaliation from Israel which will happen whether there is any Tel Aviv left or not. The return fire will eliminate Iran from the world stage and from the Middle East for a very long time, measured in half lives.
I have no doubt that the US Navy , assuming there is still a carrier in range, has orders to shoot down IDF planes when they launch against Iran which guarantees that Israel's first shot will be to sink that carrier.
Hussein wants Iran to fire the first shot in the coming exchange.
The only way out seems to be that Israel might have an anti-missile capacity of which we know not.
26 posted on 08/08/2015 5:12:51 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

And Mrs. Bill is stupider than Hussein. She would be even more puppetlike.


27 posted on 08/08/2015 5:18:12 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BerniesFriend

Nothing at all would force the resignation or the firing of John Kerry before January 2017. Buchanan is dreaming that the current regime is like traditional governments.


28 posted on 08/08/2015 5:20:01 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

This column by Buchanan belongs in Willis Carto’s Spotlight.


29 posted on 08/08/2015 7:28:40 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

Right there, I reached for the barf bag.


30 posted on 08/08/2015 3:59:52 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
"The Arabs are after our blood"
by Christopher Farah
Jan. 23, 2004
In a recent interview with the liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Morris not only justified the 1948 expulsion of the Palestinians from Israel, but also said that then-Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion failed in his task by not expelling all Arabs from the nascent Jewish state... Morris went on to say that renewed expulsions of the Palestinians -- those in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and even those who are Israeli citizens -- could be "entirely reasonable" in circumstances that are "liable to be realized in five or 10 years." ...The Arab and Muslim world, in his eyes, consists of barbarians who don't appreciate the value of human life, barbarians knocking on the gates of the civilized West... Like many other Israeli liberals, Morris' optimism about peace, and whether the Palestinians really wanted it, was shaken by the outbreak of the second intifada in 2000 -- after the Oslo peace accords and the Camp David talks had convinced many that a resolution was at hand. With the collapse of the Camp David talks amid mutual acrimony and the escalation of violence, in particular the rise of suicide bombings within Israel, many Israeli peaceniks became disillusioned, feeling that they had found no true "partner for peace" in the Palestinians... "You go to have coffee with your equally liberal friends, you talk peace and human rights and Palestinian independence, and if you are lucky the place blows up only after you leave," says Tom Segev, an Israeli author who like Morris was dubbed a "new historian" for writing books that challenged the traditional Israeli version of history.

31 posted on 08/08/2015 9:09:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson