Yeah, wouldn’t want to deal with actual physical evidence. Mercy, it is so much easier to attack sources and make personal attacks than to deal with actual content or facts. Maybe you can cover your ears during the debate and the rest of the campaign if anybody mentions something you don’t like.
You are an idiot. David French has the same vaunted tapes and has posted them as well. The difference is that he doesn’t have a looney leftie agenda and can debunk the nonsense that you are peddling.
The sources are so good, that they are gone from Free Republic aren’t they? What explanation do you have for that? You don’t understand the posting process or something?
Defending that the travesty of justice that occurred in Wisconsin convinces me that you agree with it and support it. Such a person has no decency and no sense of justice.
it's not evidence until a court admits it. Crap posted on a blog isn't "actual" anything except crap posted on a blog.
Mercy, it is so much easier to attack sources
No need to attack sources. Your "sources" long ago lost all credibility with anyone with more cortex than a mollusk, simply on the basis of what they've posted in the past.
Here's an idea: how about posting the HOME PAGE of PrWatch, your vaunted "source?" You won't do that, will you?
Maybe you can cover your ears during the debate and the rest of the campaign if anybody mentions something you don’t like.
Answer one basic question, and we'll see whether we need to take you seriously during the campaign [or any other time:] Do you, or do you not believe that indictments based on ANONYMOUS prosecutors with ANONYMOUS witnesses and SECRET evidence have any place in a country with a Bill of Rights?
Just answer that ONE question. "conservative"joy.
You are a liar and a troll.
L
So, based on the approach you’ve taken on FR, how many hearts and minds do you think you’ve changed? That is your intention, right?