Posted on 08/05/2015 6:19:16 AM PDT by lbryce
The Obama administration continues to harbor hope that the recent nuclear deal with Iran will alter the Islamic regimes behavior and produce a more stable and peaceful Middle East, according to recent reports, despite criticism from analysts who say the United States has a poor track record of using diplomacy alone to change the nature of rogue regimes.
While the administration is selling the agreement to skeptical lawmakers as a short-term measure that will prevent Iran from procuring a nuclear weapon, top U.S. officials still believe the deal could help achieve a new long-term equilibrium between warring Shiite and Sunni forces in the Middle East, the New York Times recently reported. A senior administration official told the Times that President Obama views the nuclear pact as an opportunity to help solve the meta-conflict in the Middle East between Shiite Iran and the Sunni leaders of Saudi Arabia.
However, previous U.S. efforts to transform rogue regimes through diplomacy were widely viewed as unsuccessful. In the case of North Korea, President Bill Clinton signed the Agreed Framework with Pyongyang in 1994, which placed constraints on its nuclear program but allowed it to eventually build two light-water reactors.
The Bush administration later discovered that North Korea was covertly enriching uranium, and Pyongyang tested its first nuclear weapon in 2006.
According to the Washington Posts Glenn Kessler, who covered the breakdown in the Agreed Framework, Some former Clinton administration officials will also concede that they never thought they would have to build the light-water reactors because they assumed, wrongly, that the regime would collapse before the reactors would be built. So one could argue that the Agreed Framework was built on a bad bet in the first place.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Give a homicidal bully nuclear weapons and it will make him kinder and gentler ?
Another author who fails to state the obvious: Obama and his functionaries, hate the US, hate Israel and want to bring down Western civilization. They are terrorism enablers and Muslim lovers who intend to destroy or subjugate the infidels before a US empowered and funded Greater Caliphate. Millions of dead Christians, Jews and other infidels will be the result and Obama will celebrate the accomplishment.
Because it worked so well for Neville Chamberlain.
So,the legacy of Obama's tenure is not one devoted to peace but just the opposite, which begs the question, why is it that he has all of a sudden become a big believer in peace? How is it that the world's number one terror state, one of its leaders having said, the first thing they would do wen they acquire nuclear weapons is to ignite the entire of Saudi Arabia's oil(Sunnis, Shi'ites consider each other more abominable than Jews) yet Obama sees some transformative power to which the Iranians will start selling girl scout cookies the moment the nuclear genie is out of the Iranian nuclear birthday box. So why does Obama of a sudden seek peace with the most duplicitous, war-mongering nation on Earth? Why does the Arab World cower in fear? You've given us the answer. None of what Obama seems to be dedicating to peace is legitimate. If anything, he wants Iran to acquire nuclear weapons as one of his legacies, as a blood-thirsty, homicidal nihilist out to see parts of the world destroyed.
Obama continues to think his community organizer cred can enable him to pull a rabbit out of a hat. Unfortunately for the world, SAMO, SAMO.
Transformative means turning big cities into glow in the dark rubble with a few well placed ICBMs. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles..Of course, by definition, there will be fewer, but better liberals.
Very well done. And it ties up all those loose ends very nicely, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.