Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: This_far

A tax cut had been approved for the next year. The $300 was given in advance because Bush was going to “stimulate” the economy. Had you not gotten the $300 in 2007 you would have gotten it in 2008 anyway. But the 2008 tax cut was decreased by $300 the next year. That’s the way it was for millions and millions of people. Your situation must have been different.

Another thing Bush did. If you bought a house you got a tax break of, I think it was $7,000, that had to be paid back over the next few years. Obama came in and people who bought houses got an $8,000 rebate that they did not have to pay back and it was retro-active back to January 1, 2009. The difference in closing on a house on December 31, 2008 and Jan 2nd, 2009 was a $7,000 load as opposed to an $8,000 rebate.

I assume Obama did it just to piss more people off at Bush even though he was already gone. Maybe that was the first “Bush’s fault” excuse.


89 posted on 08/08/2015 7:42:52 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Since you're so much smarter than me, don't waste your time insulting me. I won't understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: VerySadAmerican

team back time out...

You seem to have a grasp of prior tax code/rebate.

How about running up some numbers that can be used in the upcoming elections?

Don’t get TOO deep though (remember who we’re dealing with)

I try to get people to use the same $300 dollar rebate but compared with current administration waste

How much is a million, a billion, a trillion ... etc

Their eyes go wobbly before I can even get them to compare it what they make!


90 posted on 08/08/2015 9:46:49 PM PDT by This_far (Mandatory insurance! I thought it was about health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson