Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK

Who knows the timeline there. Perhaps the $1000 fine was for something that took place after the incident these charges are related to. Perhaps he had already extricated himself, but was found to be in violation for something he did earlier.

The only reason I’m even talking about the guy, is related to having watched what they did to Tom Delay down there.

I’ve got no burden to bear related to this specific guy.

If he’s guilty, he should have to face the penalty.

This better be a big deal though. If it’s letter of the law enforcement, the prosecutor could come off looking like the over the top bad guy.

We’ll see.


24 posted on 08/03/2015 10:33:21 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

I agree completely. No more Delay treatment should be tolerated. As you say, we’ll see. I have no clue at this point. That the Rangers were investigating impressed me. Their findings are, historically, not bought.


32 posted on 08/03/2015 10:43:02 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Perhaps the $1000 fine was for something that took place after the incident these charges are related to. Perhaps he had already extricated himself, but was found to be in violation for something he did earlier.

The fine was a civil penalty (with a lower burden of proof) not criminal. So same facts, but not a double jeopardy situation.

52 posted on 08/03/2015 5:37:40 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson