So, by your line of reasoning, Trump is also "petty and "vindictive".
I don't see anything "petty" when we're talking about millions in renovations, millions involved in a 10-year contract and other huge money committments connected with the massive edifice, I would scarcely call Trump's suit "petty". Is it "vindictive" when any fool knows that if this chef can get away with busting his long-term committment for no legal reason that other renters in the property could and would do the same?
Trump is protecting himself, his business and his investment in the property, as any smart businessman would do. I'd do it myself...and the smart-ass chef would learn a thing or two about money and ethics.
Since you obviously consider yourself such an all-knowing critic, a canny second-guesser and a super-smart business man, let me know when you are the proud, free-enterprise owner of a multi-billion dollar portfolio like Mr. Trump's.
Leni
Give ‘em hell Leni.
Or as H.S.T. reportedly said, “I don’t give them hell, I tell them the truth and they think it’s hell”. Ellis