I’m not moving any goalposts. I’m just using your argument as I continue to say - the shooting was valid.
“Facts be damned”?
Those four facts I posted in 65 cannot be damned. Or do YOU deny and dispute them?
The facts you posted in 65 do not justify the use of deadly force. Starting the ignition and putting it into gear does not create an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm for the officer (who was, at the time, positioned next to the car, and had not yet even reached into the car - he did that only AFTER the car was turned on).