1 posted on
07/30/2015 3:03:56 PM PDT by
bkopto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: bkopto
Doesn’t work in Chicago but these pinheads think LA will be different.
32 posted on
07/30/2015 3:22:24 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
To: bkopto
When are the gangsters going to turn theirs in?
33 posted on
07/30/2015 3:22:58 PM PDT by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking.)
To: bkopto
So thankful that I live in a small, quiet, sane town.....in Texas!
36 posted on
07/30/2015 3:25:54 PM PDT by
gop4lyf
(Gay marriage is neither)
To: bkopto
Just like they ban underage drinking, drunk driving, speeding, burglaries, murders, rapes, etc. etc.
To: bkopto
This will really piss off the Bluds,Crips and MS 13!
39 posted on
07/30/2015 3:32:21 PM PDT by
Renegade
To: bkopto
My pistol is already illegal in CA as it has a threaded tip that can accept a silencer. We do not travel there...
That being said, if I have an 10 round clip (which I do have) couldn’t I just put a Sponge Bob head on it and load it with PEZ?
I’m just sayin’...
40 posted on
07/30/2015 3:32:51 PM PDT by
BBB333
(Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
To: bkopto
Perfect opportunity for a local mom and pop metal shop to begin turning out LA Special 9 round mags.
41 posted on
07/30/2015 3:33:19 PM PDT by
Rebelbase
( NASCAR 2015: "Bootlegger to boot licker"--FReeper Crim)
To: bkopto
Ten round are no different than nine round or any other round. The marxists have a long established M O attacking things in increments. They'll take one bullet away at a time until we only have one left. Then they will slowly take the gun power out of the bullet, one grain at a time.
43 posted on
07/30/2015 3:39:34 PM PDT by
oldbrowser
(The kangaroos have taken over the supreme court.)
To: bkopto
I'm no lawyer (I'm moral) but what is there about “ex post facto” bans that CA/LA can't wrap their dinky little minds around?
45 posted on
07/30/2015 3:42:48 PM PDT by
Lee Enfield
(I identify as rich, cut me a check.)
To: bkopto
This is terribly written. Does this law supercede state law granfathering in high capacity magazines purchased before 1992, or what? I am confused.
46 posted on
07/30/2015 3:45:39 PM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(The Confederate Flag is the new "N" word.)
To: bkopto
Let’s see how many fools turn in their magazines. You know the criminals won’t.
47 posted on
07/30/2015 3:51:54 PM PDT by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: bkopto
The state of California already has a silly unconstitutional “law” like this in case anyone wishes to obey it. Why city councilmen or legislators waste their time on nonsensical, unenforceable, and patently illegal rules is anyone’s guess. Like, it’s not like LA is free of any real problems for them to work at. A BS award to the city of angels.
To: bkopto
When lawful gun owners no longer have 10-shot mags, only the criminals will.
Crime rates to shoot (pardon the expression) through the ceiling if passed. Criminals sending contributions to the LA City Council members in thanks for this stupid vote.
To: bkopto
Los Angeles has no such authority. They are preempted by State law in this instance.
53 posted on
07/30/2015 4:32:22 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Donald Trump is Ross Perot, with hair.)
To: bkopto
54 posted on
07/30/2015 4:43:16 PM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
To: bkopto
To: bkopto
I assume Hollywood was exempted, but then their guns rarely seem to run out of ammo anyway.
58 posted on
07/30/2015 5:37:19 PM PDT by
Boomer One
( ToUse)
To: bkopto
Myself, I prefer the popular 1 round magazines. When Magpul comes out with a 1/2 round magazine, that will be my next favorite. Of course, the Holy Grail will be the 0 round magazine, which should sell like hot cakes in California until the -1 magazine debuts. The ‘-1’ magazine will also be a big contributor to the reduction of the cost of ammunition and terrorists will be unable to inflict much less damage.
To: bkopto
This will be popular in Inglewood I’m sure...
Idiots
60 posted on
07/30/2015 6:02:33 PM PDT by
BlueNgold
(May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
To: bkopto
Brilliant New strategy of pro-Gunners,,,
laws,laws ?
We don’t need No stinking laws!
63 posted on
07/30/2015 8:45:52 PM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
