Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/28/2015 10:58:53 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican

In before somebody brings up dilithium crystals. I just did!


2 posted on 07/28/2015 11:01:24 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

yeah, this is the one the musloids used to go to the moon in 1635


3 posted on 07/28/2015 11:03:43 PM PDT by grandpa jones (obama delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

In all reality. They need to stop talking theory and spend a million with a prototype, tracking suite, and a trip on a SpaceX Dragon.

Put one up and see how it flies. If its as successful as the theory purports, the proof of cost will be chump change.


4 posted on 07/28/2015 11:03:58 PM PDT by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

The conservation of momentum isn’t violated just because the mass dispersed is too small to measure. If a miniscule even microscopic mass is dispersed at speeds approaching C, a great amount of momentum can still be maintained. The issue to me would seem controlled vectoring of such a device.


8 posted on 07/28/2015 11:18:01 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
'The EM Drive was developed by the British inventor Roger Shawyer nearly 15 years ago but was ridiculed at the time as being scientifically impossible.'


11 posted on 07/28/2015 11:46:39 PM PDT by Viking2002 (The Avatar is back by popular request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Anyone with a good physics background should be able to see that the thing produces thrust based on those 1/4-20 threaded rods.


13 posted on 07/29/2015 12:13:37 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Half the trip better be spent in braking.


16 posted on 07/29/2015 12:32:11 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (This is no deal, Øbama is negotiating terms of surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

EM Flux Capacitor Drive


17 posted on 07/29/2015 12:37:54 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

18 posted on 07/29/2015 12:47:29 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Roger Shawyer got the idea from John Titor.


20 posted on 07/29/2015 1:36:14 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

How long before some government bureaucrat declares that such an engine would damage the ozone layer upon activation, and make such engines illegal?


24 posted on 07/29/2015 3:04:31 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (With the things that are about to come to light. People might just need a little old-fashioned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Oh Boy! Another perpetual motion machine.

Do some of you “old Freepers” remember about 10 years ago the guy who invented a perpetual motion device that was so amazing and secret that he could not demonstrate it in public? We had many hours of entertainment here at FR on that “amazing” invention.

I guess a new discussion on this wonder invention will be entertainment on FR for months to come.


26 posted on 07/29/2015 3:31:14 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
It produces thrust by using solar power to generate multiple microwaves that move back and forth in an enclosed chamber.

Well that’s good. I can’t imagine how you would generate just one microwave.

On a serious note it seems that the author is trying to make this out to be a GREEN rocket engine because it will be SOLAR powered.

But that would seriously limit the rocket’s utility to space travel near the sun. The further from the sun the spacecraft gets the less power would be available from the sun.

30 posted on 07/29/2015 4:18:00 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Bring her up to warp speed Scotty. :-)


34 posted on 07/29/2015 5:19:57 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Solar powered. Hmmm, better travel in the light!! Keep it in the light!


37 posted on 07/29/2015 6:40:31 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

I want to see test results where they’ve actually been able to generate at least 10000 pounds of “thrust” with this engine. Then I’ll believe it.


39 posted on 07/29/2015 8:09:05 AM PDT by zeugma (The best defense against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

“has left scientists scratching their heads because it defies one of the fundamental concepts of physics –”

I suspect that there is very little head scratching going on, other than to marvel at the gullibility of journalists.


41 posted on 07/29/2015 8:18:25 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican; Rockingham; pepsi_junkie; Spktyr; BlueNgold; Crazieman

Why wouldn’t this technology be used to create vast amounts of energy at a fraction of prices currently paid?


42 posted on 07/29/2015 2:41:05 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson