I don't do "nuance", a term oft-used by hussein and other leftists. John Russell Houser wrote the following words:
I was for his [hussein's] re-election. I like his spending habits.
And that's all there is to it. His words are clear and entirely unambiguous as he explains his support for the 'RAT regime. He was an evil, murderous DemonRAT.
That party has a long history of murder -- favoring abortion and political murders. See Sirhan Sirhan, James Earl Ray, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley, Squeaky Fromme, Giuseppe Zangara and others of that ilk. All leftwing 'RATs -- every one of them.
I don’t know what political party he favored, but his raving lunatic mind was very upset with amoral people and immorality in todays society which he attempted to explain in his admiration of Hitler, and again in this snippet of his manifesto where he lauds Obama as being more effective in tearing down that immorality then Tim McVeigh was. (that means he wanted the country to crash and burn and Obama was the best way to do that)
So if that means to you that he was a demorat, or a lefty, then carry on....It does not matter in the long term.
I would prefer to call him a nutcase anarchist. His politics, if you want to call it that, was at best undefinable at worst, off the scale on both left and right.. He was off the chart where the nuts live on both political sides.
No, Cold Heat is right- the reason he stated for liking Obama is that Obama will bring the system down, and his spending habits will bring down the economy.
Question is, what did the guy think should replace the system once it fails?
Something like “what the founders envisioned” or something else?
I don’t know. Maybe he didn’t think that far ahead and was just ending the chess game by knocking the pieces off the chessboard so everyone loses and no one can win.