Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rare EIB Interview: Senator Ted Cruz on Why He Called His Leader a Liar
EIB ^ | July 24, 2015

Posted on 07/24/2015 12:00:23 PM PDT by Isara

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: fortheDeclaration
.

With all due respect, you too are an "idiot" ...

Have you ever been in a situtation where a "leader" (political, religious or business) would DARE stand-up in front of 54 of his/her colleagues ...

and declare an outright "lie" ... and then repeat it two more times just for effect ?



Ted Cruz (and most other people) knew that Mitch McConnell was a snake, but NOT BRAZEN enough to lie "publicly" in front of 54 people.

I would have been fooled as well, and at sixty (60) that doesn't happen much anyome (at least as far as politics).



What Ted Cruz did today was akin to William Wallace in "Braveheart".

Unless Mitch McOnnell dies in office, Senator Ted Cruz will be ETERNALLY SCREWED by Mitch McConnell.

Ted Cruz sacrificed his "senate career" to tell the UGLY and NAKED truth ...

and you're a "fool of a took" to be throwing rocks at him ...



I guess, that for you, things must be going pretty badly in your Rand Paul/Lindsey Graham/John Kasisch/Mike Huckabee campaign ...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPLq-5e6ulE

.
21 posted on 07/24/2015 12:53:18 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

McConnell looked into the eyes of Ted Cruz and the rest of the Republican senators and told them that there was no deal, there was no deal, there was no deal. Ted Cruz is gentleman enough to take McConnell as his word.


22 posted on 07/24/2015 12:54:41 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

What I’d like to know is why he waited so long
*****************

He, and other Senators, had amendments that they wanted to attach to the “must pass” Highway Bill e.g. defund Planned Parenthood; defund Obamacare; reject Iran deal, etc...

McConnell used a procedure maneuver to block those amendments.

You may not be a Cruz supporter— so, you might question his motivation. But, the simple truth as to why he went ballistic today, is that Cruz was incensed beyond the point of containment.


23 posted on 07/24/2015 12:55:58 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

McConnell looked into the eyes of Ted Cruz and the rest of the Republican senators and told them that there was no deal, there was no deal, there was no deal. Ted Cruz is gentleman enough to take McConnell as his word.


24 posted on 07/24/2015 12:56:29 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
I received a letter from the RNC about a month ago asking for a contribution. I sent back the postage paid letter saying, "Earn it first."

Is Ted Cruz being quasi-endorsed by Rush's mentioning of him over the past few weeks?

the answer is "yes" ...

Cruz was treated to an unusual guest appearance today by Rush because Cruz earned it today.

It would be nice to see fifty plus Republican senators line up behind Cruz and demand that the liar step down.

It would be nice for more than a handful of Democrat senators to publicly agree that Cruz did the right thing and say it's time for DC to start representing the American people for a change.

Cruz showed immense courage today. I've favored him from the start. Today I think we need him.

25 posted on 07/24/2015 1:09:32 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Cruz undoubtedly knew McConnell was a weasel, he was probably just waiting for a good unimpeachable example.

Well Done Ted.


26 posted on 07/24/2015 1:13:40 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VinL
You may not be a Cruz supporter— so, you might question his motivation. But, the simple truth as to why he went ballistic today, is that Cruz was incensed beyond the point of containment.

I am a Cruz supporter and what I meant was why did he wait till now to call McConnell a liar? McConnell has been lying steadily since before Cruz got to the Senate so it's not like the opportunity hasn't been there before.

27 posted on 07/24/2015 1:13:47 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

> “That is why they stole the MS primary from a real conservative, McDaniel, so their pathetic lackey,Thad Cochran, could keep his seat.”

And in so doing they (McConnell, PACs and Cochran and the Barbour gang) conspired with the Madison MS police department to cause the wrongful death of a fine man, Mark Mayfield. They will answer for that.


28 posted on 07/24/2015 1:17:58 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Isara

I do like how Cruz also takes some shots at Reid.


29 posted on 07/24/2015 1:18:50 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

> “I am a Cruz supporter and what I meant was why did he wait till now to call McConnell a liar?”

Because McConnell used his power TODAY as Majority Leader to block amendments, which were to fund Planned Parenthood, to fund the Ex-Im Bank, etc. Ted and others were just waiting until McConnell pulled his punches and then bam! Because otherwise he would be making accusations into the empty air.


30 posted on 07/24/2015 1:21:38 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

bump


31 posted on 07/24/2015 1:26:27 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Isara

During the last election, There were a few posters who called me all kinds of names for stating that backing McTurtle was a mistake. Told me we were stronger with him, that we needed him, that I was foolish for not seeing it.

I (and many others) were right. We would have been better off if we had lost that race and cut some baggage.

I hope the GOPe sheep can manage to remember this until the next election is over. This was nothing short of betrayal.


32 posted on 07/24/2015 1:32:37 PM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Bkmk for later.


33 posted on 07/24/2015 1:36:39 PM PDT by krunkygirl (force multiplier in effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

If Senator Cruz knew he was going to lose the fight on the loans, then the brilliant strategy is to take McTurtles word and then have the issue to weaken him for the next fight. It is called a phyrric victory, and winning this fight will cost McTurtle plenty.


34 posted on 07/24/2015 1:37:30 PM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VinL

What I’d like to know is why he waited so long
________________________________________

I think Trump’s straight talk is reverberating in the other candidates’ minds. It’s past time to step up or lose America.


35 posted on 07/24/2015 1:38:02 PM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Isara

.


36 posted on 07/24/2015 1:38:58 PM PDT by right way right (Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
However, I am still upset over his 'yes' vote for the Free Trade Agreement.

I see that a lot, and can relate to a degree. However, Ted's a free trader at heart. That's pretty clear. That particular vote for the trade agreement was a vote establishing the rules by which the treaty will be handled by the senate once it is finalized. (the treaty still isn't final yet). Every president for the past 50 or more years has had to negotiate trade treaties in this way.

You can't have congress amending the verbiage of the deal after the negotiations with trade partners has produced the agreement, because then you'd have to go back to the negotiating table to essentially hammer out a new deal. I agree with that part. The senate should vote the negotiated treaty up/down without amendments.

What I emphatically do not agree with is calling these things "trade agreements" when they are, in fact, treaties. They should require the same 2/3 majority that any other treaty should have. None of this 51% crap. I believe that Cruz should have called out the lying bastards on that aspect of it. That puts more pressure on the administration to negotiate a bettertreaty than it would otherwise have to reach because the level of necessary support would be that much greater.

 

37 posted on 07/24/2015 1:40:34 PM PDT by zeugma (The best defense against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Rush doesn’t under EX-IM. It doesn’t lend money, it eithers guarantees loans or provides loan insurance. Cruz said this in his statement

The company both large and not so large go toEx-Im and have the loan by their own bank or banks guaranteed. Unless the customer doesn’t pay or there is a war or other bad circumstance, EX/Im pays nothing. Ex-Im is paid for the service. by the company getting the guarantee.

Taxpayers don’t loan the money or lose any money unless there is a default. Then Ex/Im pays the lending bank for the defaulted amount and then can collect from the defaulting party.

I don’t have stats on defaults but they are low.

The Ex/Im process allows commercial banks to make loans they other wise could not

EX/Im banks is involved with companies much smaller than Boeing. Ex/Im bank should be approved again


38 posted on 07/24/2015 1:53:00 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
Taxpayers don’t loan the money or lose any money unless there is a default.

If Boeing makes a killing do I get some money out of it? Of course not. So I'm taking risks, however small, but there is no reward. Its bullshit.

39 posted on 07/24/2015 2:13:40 PM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bert
Ex-Im is paid for the service. by the company getting the guarantee.

As with all government "insurance", such as flood insurance, the premium is unrealistically low. Therein lies the cronyism. Default risk is always present even for the largest corporations, for example General Motors. Default risk is being offloaded to the public in support of a favored few. Try getting an Ex-Im loan guarantee as a small exporter.

40 posted on 07/24/2015 2:14:15 PM PDT by Praxeologue ( ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson