Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz accuses McConnell of lying (Why Cruz voted for TPA)
The Hill ^

Posted on 07/24/2015 10:24:01 AM PDT by Java4Jay

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in a blistering floor speech Friday accused Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) of lying to him over a deal to vote on reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cromnibus; cruz; doddfrank; eib; election2016; elizabethwarren; exportimportbank; fauxahontas; glasssteagall; kentucky; lieawatha; massachusetts; mitchmcconnell; tedcruz; texas; tisa; tpa; tpp; treacherousturtle; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: Balding_Eagle
Send us a street fighter, otherwise, all is lost.

Are you willing to fight along side Ted Cruz?

121 posted on 07/24/2015 2:01:54 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Senator Cruz entirely understands the widespread suspicion of the President. Nobody has been more vocal in pointing out the President’s lawlessness or more passionate about fighting his usurpation of congressional authority.

Senator Cruz would not and will not give President Obama one more inch of unrestricted power.

There have been a lot of questions and concerns about the ongoing Pacific trade negotiations. Many of those concerns, fueled by the media, stem from confusion about Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Let’s unpack the issues one by one.

What are TPA and TPP?
TPA stands for Trade Promotion Authority, also known as “fast track”. TPA is a process by which trade agreements are approved by Congress. Through TPA, Congress sets out up-front objectives for the Executive branch to achieve in free trade negotiations; in exchange for following those objectives, Congress agrees to hold an up-or-down vote on trade agreements without amendments. For the past 80 years, it has proven virtually impossible to negotiate free-trade agreements without the fast-track process.

TPP stands for Trans-Pacific Partnership. TPP is a specific trade agreement currently being negotiated by the United States and 11 other countries, including Canada, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. China is not a negotiating partner. There is no final language on TPP because negotiations are still ongoing and have been since late 2009. Neither the Senate nor the House has voted yet on the TPP. There will be no vote on TPP until the negotiations are over and the final agreement is sent to Congress.

Some Key Facts:

Does TPA give up the Senate’s treaty power?
No. Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law: (1) through a treaty, ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, or (2) through legislation passed by a majority of both Houses of Congress. TPA employs the second constitutional path, as trade bills always have done. It has long been recognized that the Constitution’s Origination Clause applies to trade bills, requiring the House of Representatives’ involvement.

Does the United States give up Sovereignty by entering into TPP?
No. Nothing in the agreement forces Congress to change any law. TPA explicitly provides that nothing in any trade agreement can change U.S. law. Congress is the only entity that can make U.S. law, and Congress is the only entity that can change U.S. law. Nothing about TPP or TPA could change that.

Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPP?
Senator Cruz has not taken a position either in favor or against TPP. He will wait until the agreement is finalized and he has a chance to study it carefully to ensure that the agreement will open more markets to American-made products, create jobs, and grow our economy. Senator Cruz has dedicated his professional career to defending U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution. He will not support any trade agreement that would diminish or undermine either.

Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPA?
Yes. Senator Cruz voted in favor of TPA earlier this year because it breaks the logjam that is preventing the U.S. from entering into trade deals that are good for American workers, American businesses, and our economy. Ronald Reagan emphatically supported free trade, and Senator Cruz does as well. He ran for Senate promising to support free trade, and he is honoring that commitment to the voters.

Free trade helps American farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers; indeed, one in five American jobs depends on trade, in Texas alone 3 million jobs depend on trade. When we open up foreign markets, we create American jobs.

TPA also strengthens Congress’ hand in trade negotiations, and provides transparency by making the agreement (including TPP) public for at least 60 days before the Congress can act on any final agreement. Without TPA, there is no such transparency, and the Congress’ role in trade agreements is weaker.

Is TPA Constitutional?
TPA and similar trade authority has been upheld by the Supreme Court as constitutional for more than 100 years.

Does TPA give the President more authority?
No. TPA ensures that Congress has the ability to set the objectives up-front for free trade agreements.

Trade Promotion Authority has been used to reduce trade barriers since FDR. When Harry Reid took over the Senate, he killed it. History demonstrates that it is almost impossible to negotiate a free-trade agreement without TPA. Right now without TPA, America is unable to negotiate free-trade agreements, putting the United States at a disadvantage to China, which is taking the lead world-wide. It is not in America’s interests to have China writing the rules of international trade.

Moreover, Obama is going to be president for just 18 more months. TPA is six-year legislation. If we want the next president (hopefully a Republican) to be able to negotiate free-trade agreements to restart our economy and create jobs here at home then we must reinstate TPA. With a Republican president in office, Senate Democrats would almost certainly vote party-line to block TPA, so now is the only realistic chance.

How can Senator Cruz trust Obama?
He doesn’t. Not at all. No part of Senator Cruz’s support for TPA was based on trusting Obama. However, under TPA, every trade deal is still subject to approval by Congress. If the Obama Administration tries to do something terrible in a trade agreement, Congress can vote it down. And most congressional Democrats will always vote no—because union bosses oppose free trade, so do most Democrats—which means a handful of conservative congressional Republicans have the votes to kill any bad deal. That’s a serious check on presidential power.

Isn’t TPP a “living agreement”?
That particular phrase—a foolish and misleading way to put it—is found in the “summary” portion of one particular section of the draft agreement. That section allows member nations to amend the agreement in the future, expressly subject to the approval of their governments. Thus, if some amendment were proposed in the future, Congress would have to approve it before it went into effect.

But isn’t TPA a secret agreement?
No, it is not. The full text of TPA (fast track) is public. What the Senate just voted for was TPA, not TPP.

Right now, the text of TPP is classified. That is a mistake. Senator Cruz has vigorously called on the Obama administration to make the full text of TPP open to the public immediately. The text being hidden naturally only fuels concerns about what might be in it. Senator Cruz has read the current draft of TPP, and it should be made public now.

Critically, under TPA, TPP cannot be voted on until after the text has been public for 60 days. Therefore, everyone will be able to read it long before it comes up for a vote.

Couldn’t Obama use a trade agreement to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants?
No. There is one section of TPP that concerns immigration, but it affects only foreign nations—the United States has explicitly declined to sign on to that section.

Moreover, Senator Cruz introduced a TPA amendment to expressly prohibit any trade deal from attempting to alter our immigration laws.

Two Republican Senators (Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul) blocked the Senate’s consideration of that amendment, but the House of Representatives has agreed to include that language in the final text of the trade legislation. Thus, assuming the House honors that public commitment, federal law will explicitly prohibit any trade deal from impacting immigration.

And, regardless, no trade agreement can change U.S. law; only Congress can change U.S. law.

122 posted on 07/24/2015 2:04:19 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

McConnell looked at Cruz and said “Yeh that’s the ticket.” :-)


123 posted on 07/24/2015 2:07:53 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Isara

NOW Is Cruz or anyone trying to stop TPP ( the Obama trade agenda that will destroy the USA with unlimited immigration and other horrors) that is about to pass and that TPA made it extremely easy to pass?


124 posted on 07/24/2015 2:40:23 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Obama will use Obamatrade to import hundreds of millions of 3rd world people into the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
Some Key Facts:

Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPP?
Senator Cruz has not taken a position either in favor or against TPP. He will wait until the agreement is finalized and he has a chance to study it carefully to ensure that the agreement will open more markets to American-made products, create jobs, and grow our economy. Senator Cruz has dedicated his professional career to defending U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution. He will not support any trade agreement that would diminish or undermine either.

125 posted on 07/24/2015 3:02:02 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Ridiculous bs. It’s been leaked by wikileaks. This TPP will allow Obama to destroy the USA with unlimited immigration, SOPA and other horrors.

I’ve been warning people about this for a long time. You are worried only about how it makes Cruz look. I’m worried what the obama trade agenda TPP will do to the USA and our jobs.


126 posted on 07/24/2015 3:05:25 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Obama will use Obamatrade to import hundreds of millions of 3rd world people into the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Isara
Are you willing to fight along side Ted Cruz?

I'm going to stick with the street fighter in the campaign.

There is no doubt that Cruz is the true conservative, but he's fighting like the British fought. Trump, like the colonists.

We all know how that turned out.

127 posted on 07/24/2015 3:34:49 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Isara

I don’t support any of them. They are all just paid staff of our corporate owners. The next leader (note I did not say politician) I support will be the one that says “Its way past time to burn this s-—t down and start over.”

I am still astonished that people on this site, that should know better, are still willing to support any of these people. Its like watching an entire nation of abused wives, foolishly clinging to the promise of “this one will be different”. Mind boggling and disheartening.


128 posted on 07/24/2015 5:16:24 PM PDT by L,TOWM (Is it still too soon to start shooting? [No social transformation without representation])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Uh oh. You just blasphemed Cruz. You’d better get ready. It’s about to get hot!


129 posted on 07/24/2015 6:57:40 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (I'll never vote for another rino and it sickens me that I voted for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Yes, I’ve taken fire over those remarks already, and I think I put up a pretty good defense/offense.

These a good case to be made that my assertion is correct.

Cruz would make a good VP for trump, and over the next 8 years he could help Trump, and Trump could groom him to take over.

By then I think he would be ready to be an excellent President.


130 posted on 07/24/2015 7:29:30 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson