OK, we all operate and draw conclusions based on information provided by somebody somewhere.
Behold the man and consider his more recent behavior. Is he a leopard with new spots?
He is not our friend. He is just some guy with a story embraced by many, rebuked by some.
The notion that every negative point reported about the 50 years ago McCain is a lie is probably of the same stuff that a lot of History is made of.
I think that he is slime and have thought so for many years.
You want to defend this guy and accept the ‘official’ reports that got the almost renegade son of an Admiral out of a serious fix, then you are entitled.
I really am curious, though, apart from that. What do you think he did to cause the conflagration?
I don’t want to be enemies with you on FR over this, but I am honestly curious. Not trying to trick you here, just want to understand how you think it happened.
If you don’t want to answer, and just want to leave it at your ability to understand human nature to determine what happened that day, I won’t push any further.