*sigh*
"What the hell is the world commin to?...give me a smoke Junior"
Posted on 07/22/2015 8:09:54 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg
A lit cigarette is a potential danger to an officer’s safety.
If an officer doesn’t want a person who he is investigating to be next to him while holding a burning object, then he can order that person to extinguish the burning object, thus rendering it a threat no longer.
Sorry, BRAH, cops do this all the time.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/20/us/texas-sandra-bland-jail-death/
This report says that the DA is conducting the inquiry into Bland’s death as if it were a Murder!
He can tell her to put it down, I said that before. He can also tell her not to smoke while he is talking to him. Sure. But if she sets a lit cigarette onto the ashtray, he can’t then tell her to put it out. Her putting it out has nothing to do with the performance of a traffic stop.
Yeah you keep claiming such but so far you offer no proof. The deadly weapon claim is funny BTW.
And apparently the people in charge of this officer ain't buying it either because he has been pulled from street duty.
Right... I know nothing of the law.
Still waiting for a link to a case where a police officer telling someone to put out a cigarette was upheld by the court.
Your asserted that earlier, waiting to see evidence.
A “dangerous” weapon.
Maybe you should lay off trying to read while you’re drunk.. LOL!
LOLOLOLOLOL
Okay, you're just a moron. You obviously won't even try to use reason, so it's over.
Since cig smoke is commonly used to mask MJ then yes, smoking can interfere with his duty to detect drug usage. Also, it can be used to burn the cop so for officer safety he can order it out.
Again, as shown in the statutes provided, any order that does not directly contradict state/federal law or civil rights is deemed a lawful order according to State law. If you don’t like the law then change it, but otherwise you must follow the law.
I provided 4 statutes already. You’ve provided nothing that states it is not a lawful order.
So you are saying that the DA has a conclusion looking for an investigation?
Yes, he can, and you have no idea what you are talking about, and a lit cigarette can be used as a dangerous weapon.
He violated the courtesy policy which is why he is on desk duty. He didn’t violate any law.
Can you not read??? I already provided 4 statutes showing he had the authority to give the lawful order and she was required to follow that lawful order.
Please provide ANY evidence that states that this was not a lawful order. So far you’ve provide nada.
Gee, good manners and proper respect for legitimate authority is so square. Embrace the mayhem, civilization is overrated!!
Dude, I’ve provide you the 4 statutes that provide the facts. You don’t even want to read them nor do any research on your own. You’re apparently the total moron because you know nothing of the law, but you keep making claims that are clearly disputed by the laws provided.
The only exception is searches a probable cause. Which neither apply in this case.
She had a really bad attitude. Evidently, she may have had an arrest record. They mentioned a record, but didn’t say what it was for.
People act like the policeman killed her. She could have taken him to court if he didn’t follow procedure, but she chose to kill herself. Also interesting she spent 3 days in jail. Wouldn’t anyone in her family help pay her bond?
Let me guess, you’re not a Texan, you’re not a cop, and you’re not an attorney. Your only exposure to the law is watching Judge Judy and as an armchair know-it-all. You’re clearly not qualified for this debate.
You are correct about searches.
Interesting if that is so why are they investigating it as a murder?
Strange...
*sigh*
"What the hell is the world commin to?...give me a smoke Junior"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.