Goldman Sachs...can we ever hear about Jeb and the Lehman brothers)
Cruz will never follow the herd and Political Correctness isn’t in his extensive vocabulary.
Two more reasons for supporting him.
Bullschtein!
The WSJ has long been shamelessly open borders and an arm of the Republican Establishment, much like FOX.
I knew it. The knives are starting to come out for Cruz as well. Et tu, WSJ?
cruz, Trump and the others will not survive the GOPe wishes. They have too much power, too many connections, and they make the rules.
Only one alternative: Cruz and Trump flip Rove the bird and go third party Independent. There is no other way. This is the third article unfairly bashing Ted Cruz in as many weeks.
Incidentally, if you want to make money, don’t read the Wall Street Journal. Go with Investor’s Business Daily. And their editorial board is much more reasonable.
Frankly, ANY reporter, journalist, media news reader, media pundit, analyst, ‘expert’ or whatever else they call themselves that has the audacity to talk about “Lack of Character” should examine their own pathetic, miserable, useless, deceitful lives.
If ‘character’ hasn’t mattered for the past 8 years, why does it matter now?
I’m becoming tempted to cancel my WSJ subscription which is the sole remaining paper to which I subscribe (both “hardcopy” & online). Then I’ll get my news solely by ad hoc internet searches and “aggregators” such as Drudge and the upcoming Apple News.
“The papers conservative editorial board “
Bulls**t. The WSJ is a step or two less liberal than Salon when it comes to editorials.
Someone with true character would throw a friend under the bus for the sake of political advancement. /s
Oh so now we’re jumping on the bandwagon against Cruz....
REALLY????
Just because someone doesn’t say or do, look, talk, act like you want them to in your tiny little heads, well then start the dirt pilling on....
If people knew just ONCE in their lifetimes what the hell they wanted, wouldn’t it be easier???? But no, that person didn’t say this, or that person didn’t say that, or this person stood up for this person, or that person stood up for another person, their worthless....
I stand with the Trump/Cruz or Cruz/Trump ticket, there you have it, my choice, at least I made one....
The open borders hacks at the WSJ in full attack mode.
JBush protection in play.
They need Trump out because JBush’s handlers were calculating a fragmented conservative base.
If Trump knocks out the likes of Santorum, Huckabee, Jindal, Cristie etc. The field will not be fragmented enough for JBush’s 13,000 sole supporters to pay his way through to the end.
Cruz is smart - staying above the fray. Doesn’t follow the sheep when they all start bleating the canned response.
Besides, I’m now hearing conflicting stories about what Trump actually said.
The WSJ supports open borders which means it supports illegals with criminal backgrounds entering into this country. That is lacking political character!
“Conservative editorial board” my arse.
The fifth-column leftist media are experts when it comes demonstrating a complete “lack of character,” exceeded only by the fifth-column leftist media’s expertise in giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
The WSJ article that’s the background for this article might be the most revealing article about the GOP-E’s hatred of Cruz that has yet hit the media. Fortunately, they’re stupid enough to think people will pay to read their drivel, when all one has to do is listen to Fox’s broadcasts to get the group-think that takes place in those jointly-owned media outlets.
They see an opening to strike at Cruz so they take it....a media outlet...not a politician.