[Finny]

I link to it with your own words: you have the mindset that the very fact that a homeowner may have had the "attitude" of being "top dog" at the scene of his own home, regarding his own wife, as being reason enough to think the cops may have had reason to shoot him.

THAT is all the link that is needed -- see YOUR OWN WORDS.

[DoughtyOne]

That post has no link in it. Are you afraid to link to a post?

I believe you’re scared s-—less that you’ll have to defend your comments based on exactly what I said. I don’t blame you.

I never said the officers were right to shoot him. I did provide some scenarios that might cause them to.

I said that in the end the officers may be found at fault. I said we would have to wait and see.

The fact of the matter is, on duty officers on a scene are armed and in charge.

You love to play the game of the homeowner not knowing who they were.

Well mighty kong, some guy comes out of a home with a gun, how do they know he’s the homeowner. Does he have a big placard on his chest, saying homeowner on it? NO!

He was armed. That can cause problems in front of the police. If you can’t grasp that, you’re in over your head here.