You and everyone else on this thread who have this delusional idea that employees' rights outweigh their employers' interests should be very careful what you wish for. This is how private companies end up getting forced to accept all kinds of ridiculous -- and even dangerous -- conditions for their employees, under the threat of Federal EEOC actions. Mohammed can't bring in his prayer rug into my office and bend his @ss five times a day, and I'll be damned if anyone here thinks his First Amendment rights have any place in my place of business.
He will if the courts order you to let him, because it's happened at other businesses around the country.
Well the founding fathers would disagree with all your points except this:
” Mohammed can’t bring in his prayer rug into my office and bend his @ss five times a day”
Alberta’s Child,
Any other examples of “ridiculous / dangerous conditions” besides:
“Mohammed can’t bring in his prayer rug into my office and bend his @ss five times a day...”
Asinine comparison!
No one has claimed that the officer wrote his letter during working hours or on Police Department property.
So, let’s say your company does, oh, private investigations. One of your employees writes a paper about a public hot-button issue, and their name is connected to your company.
You’ll fire her?