[Facepalm]
1 posted on
07/17/2015 9:13:24 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
To: ctdonath2
Obama, Gun grabbers: “We told you so”.
This doesn’t help at all.
2 posted on
07/17/2015 9:16:19 PM PDT by
laplata
( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: ctdonath2
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office."
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office."
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office."
How do you say that with a straight face??????
To: ctdonath2
What an idiot. Did he not know federal law prohibits any weapons? He was perfectly safe in there.sarc
6 posted on
07/17/2015 9:22:02 PM PDT by
BBell
To: ctdonath2
The current climate would have rather that he shit his GI issue diapers.
Because that’s what how they think the military should operate.
7 posted on
07/17/2015 9:27:50 PM PDT by
bakeneko
To: ctdonath2
8 posted on
07/17/2015 9:48:43 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: ctdonath2
"...We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office..."
9 posted on
07/17/2015 9:51:53 PM PDT by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.Buy into it,)
To: ctdonath2
The normal and first reaction to that statement I referenced is: “They can’t be that stupid in the media. That was immediately followed by “Oh, yes. They can be that stupid.”
Many of them do completely believe the horse-hooey that comes out of their stinking pie-holes.
11 posted on
07/17/2015 9:55:12 PM PDT by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.Buy into it,)
To: ctdonath2
Maybe done on purpose to keep the military disarmed so the regime can go ahead with its coup d’état?
20 posted on
07/17/2015 10:15:54 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(B. Hussein Obama: 19 acts of Treason and counting.)
To: ctdonath2
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office. We are currently looking into that with the armed forces," Holbrook said. Armed forces? It seems everyone but the armed forces are armed. Even the guys selling Slurpees and Snicker bars are loaded for bear. They're importing big league problems into our laps. I think our military should be armed everywhere they're publicly represented. They're targets and have been. Unfortunately, we're all targets.
Our policy makers did such a wonderful job in the mideast they decided to import the mideast to us. This guy has a degree, was dropped at a job at a nuke plant for background issues? And then he's kicked back into the population? They train this guy at our universities but he's too spooky to hire at a power plant? What was the background issue?
24 posted on
07/17/2015 11:04:46 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: ctdonath2
Marines on the front lines in WWII were told not to worry, they had Navy bluejackets with rifles, there to back them up. That way the Marines fought harder and never retreated.
For the Navy anything that’s shoots something less than a 5” projectile is a challenge. Their forte is large crew served weapons not small arms.
25 posted on
07/17/2015 11:49:40 PM PDT by
Forty-Niner
(The barely bare berry bear formerly known as Arctos Horribilis.)
To: ctdonath2
Sigh. I call bull. Very crude and obvious bull.
26 posted on
07/18/2015 12:27:53 AM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: ctdonath2
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office. We are currently looking into that with the armed forces," Holbrook said. "That's part of the investigation." I imagine what happened Thursday had something to do with it.
To: ctdonath2
"We're not certain why this member of armed forces brought this gun to the office.
37 posted on
07/18/2015 11:25:08 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson