The state agreed to produce quite a bit of evidence, just w/o subpoena, and Norton got the video tapes. From the article, the only subpoena he's dropped, that will not be satisfied by agreement with the state, is to get autopsy results.
I don't see the autopsy results as being relevant to his case anyway. Those facts will be relevant in any wrongful death suits, brought on behalf of those killed, as well as criminal charges brought by the state for aggravated assault and murder.
The legal machinations relating to this event will be playing out for a decade, I'll bet. In the end, justice will be murdered.
I don't see the autopsy results as being relevant to his case anyway. Depends on what those results show.
And getting a promise to be given the records isn't the same as giving them.
In any case not releasing the autopsy results appears to be a very important point for the DA. As far as I know they haven't even used the old “tox screens aren't back yet” excuse. I know some of the dead have been buried but have all the bodies been released? I also haven't seen an interview with a wounded victim. Were they told to be quite or risk being charged? Don't recall if any of the wounded were initially charged, I suspect if so that would be why some are not talking but all of them?
https://www.google.com/#q=waco+biker+shootout+wounded+speak&tbm=nws
Returned no real exact results in the first two pages.