[PAR35]

I don't see the autopsy results as being relevant to his case anyway.

Depends on what those results show.

And getting a promise to be given the records isn't the same as giving them.

[Cboldt]

The reason I say the autopsy results aren't relevant to Ortiz's case (Norton being the lawyer), is based on an assumption that Ortiz was more or less just a witness. He didn't fire a weapon, so there is no issue to be resolved by studying ballistic and autopsy evidence.

-- And getting a promise to be given the records isn't the same as giving them. --

Understood, but the state essentially promised the judge, for what that is worth.

Separately, have you ever encountered the writings at amyirenewhite.wordpress.com? Could be mostly noise, could be a pack of fabrications, or could be good (but not proved) evidence. Watch for the name "Jason Matthew Barnum."