Digging Up Confederate Bones Would Only Make America Worse

To no one’s real surprise, the national Confederate-flag debate turns out not to be about flags alone. It’s not even truly about history. And it’s certainly not about dealing with the issues of crime and poverty that still disproportionately impact the black community. It has now moved entirely into the realm of raw cultural and political power. It’s an identity-politics hammer that is “heads, I win; tails, you lose” for all too many conservatives. With the Left in the lead, you’re either a racist for refusing to bulldoze history or — if you go along — you’re still a racist, but at least the Left has you under control.

In a piece on June 19, I articulated a simple principle: Official flag displays that are intended — like the Democrats’ displays in the 1960s — to demonstrate an official commitment to white supremacy are vile and should come down. Flag displays at Civil War monuments, memorials, and battlefields are part of history and should stay. In fact, there is no principled distinction between a flag and the monument itself. If one goes, why not the other?

Why not, indeed. A fever is now sweeping the land. In New Orleans, the mayor has proposed removing four monuments, including one of Robert E. Lee, as “public nuisances.” In her public statement, the mayor decried the “false valor” of Confederate soldiers. Nancy Pelosi introduced a resolution demanding that Mississippi’s state flag be removed from display on U.S. Capitol Grounds. Republicans in the House acquiesced in Democrat Jared Huffman’s proposal to ban even privately placed Confederate flags at Confederate grave sites in national cemeteries. And in the most bizarre move of all, the Memphis city council just voted to disturb Nathan Bedford Forrest’s grave and move his remains from under his statue (with the statue-removal vote to come later.)

This is only the beginning. Speaker of the House John Boehner is proposing a bipartisan commission with a “broad mandate” to “review all issues related to Confederate symbols” (emphasis added). Creating this commission guarantees that the “debate” (such as it is) will carry on indefinitely. I eagerly await their conclusion that social justice demands removing all Confederate remains and Confederate markers from national cemeteries, no doubt to be followed by a mandate that Confederate soldiers in battlefield reenactments fight in Nike shorts and Target T-shirts, waving “Coexist” banners as they charge Union positions.

Let’s fast-forward and imagine an increasingly plausible future where Confederate memorials are piles of rubble and Confederate bones are interred in landfills — will America be a better nation? But let’s fast-forward and imagine an increasingly plausible future where Confederate memorials are piles of rubble, Confederate bones are interred in landfills, and Confederate flags linger on mainly as fading stickers on a few mud-covered pickup trucks — will America be a better nation? Will a single inner-city school improve? Will we have taken a single meaningful step toward finding a way to responsibly end mass incarceration? Will community and police relations improve, at all? Will the leftist urban elite stop oppressing the liberal urban poor?

Of course not. In fact, by screaming “Squirrel!” at the top of their lungs, the social-justice warriors would have been rewarded with yet another round of pop-culture accolades and are empowered to engage yet another target. And, at the end of the day, America will be more ignorant, the cultural Left will be more self-righteous, and our nation’s history will be viewed as an infinitely malleable tool for delivering only Left-approved messages to the hearts and minds of our citizens.

Many thousands of the men who risked their lives and spilled blood to defeat the Confederacy would be appalled. Abraham Lincoln would see the malice toward all, the charity toward none. Ulysses S. Grant would be shocked at the notion, for example, that Pickett’s Charge represented “false valor,” and the great warrior-abolitionist, Joshua Chamberlain, would be disgusted at the thought of digging up Confederate bones to make a political statement. But why take any guidance from Union heroes when determining how to remember the past? After all, tweeters and Facebookers know so much more about right and wrong, about justice and injustice. After all, they’ve spilled their own online blood, and they have the hate-tweets to prove it.

As so often happens, the cultural Left is winning because dissenters are silent. Despite an avalanche of cultural propaganda, stubborn majorities of Americans still don’t see the Confederate flag as a symbol of hate. Yet conservative political leaders apparently believe that the loud cultural minority is more important to appease than history is to preserve. So fire up the bulldozers, the hashtagging Left will accomplish what no Union soldier ever could — knock General Lee off his horse.

Left will accomplish what no Union soldier ever could — knock General Lee off his horse.

With the complete support of the GOP.

I’ve wondered the same thing for decades, and suppose by 1970 had they been able to see the end result they would have thrown their guns down and walked away.

1865- End of The Beginning AND Beginning of The End

Thank you, Lazamataz. I love history, just not Reconstruction. The atrocities done to the South and its people make me sick, then white hot angry. They would break into a white man's house, drag him out in front of his family, then they would find his body hanging from a tree the next day. They took planters’ land, divided it up, and gave it to the former slaves (”40 acres and a mule”). The list goes on and on.

BTW, I am a member of the United Daughters of the Confederacy and do genealogy. When researching one of my ancestors, a cousin told me a story about one of my relatives (brother of my g-grandfather). She said that it was just for me. I was never to publish it; the “family” is still embarrassed about it (that was 20 years ago, 130+ years after The War’s end). The War is still very meaningful for some Southerners.

Vanderbilt met their Waterloo with the UDC over Confederate Hall. When demands were made that they chisel the name off and rename the building, the school agreed to do so. However the UDC’s attorney reminded Vanderbilt the name was in stone not only on the building but in legally binding documents agreed to when Vanderbilt accepted the donations of the organization and so the name remains.
I have a feeling the statues and other things may not be as easy to remove as those in opposition think they will be. The ladies of the UDC had very good legal representation all those many years ago.

The Administration and leftist just couldn’t get blacks riled up enough to cause mass unrest, so now poking Southern whites to cause race wars.

IN reality, the people who need to be dealt with are the elites of the administration and the leftist soros bats. These people need to be put on trial for their treasons against our country.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.