Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NetAddicted

Even if there turns out to be no such thing as a gay gene, that does not mean that someone could not have been gay from birth.


23 posted on 07/11/2015 8:16:21 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideminded
Even if there turns out to be no such thing as a gay gene, that does not mean that someone could not have been gay from birth.

Yeah it does.

24 posted on 07/11/2015 8:17:25 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: wideminded

So God created abominations? Surely you jest.


25 posted on 07/11/2015 8:19:07 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: wideminded

If there’s no gay gene, then no one is homosexual from birth. They’re homosexual from upbringing, or assault.


39 posted on 07/12/2015 11:23:52 AM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson