Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideminded
Even if there turns out to be no such thing as a gay gene, that does not mean that someone could not have been gay from birth.

Yeah it does.

24 posted on 07/11/2015 8:17:25 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER
Even if there turns out to be no such thing as a gay gene, that does not mean that someone could not have been gay from birth.

Yeah it does.

No, it doesn't. There could be something related to the uterine environment that affects the developing baby's brain.

In fact it has been proven that the likelihood that a son will be gay goes up every time a mother has another son.

So perhaps this effect is due to hormones or antibodies from the mother, not DNA.

27 posted on 07/11/2015 8:37:12 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson