You’d probably win the $10.00.
In general terms, you can’t hold a city responsible for crime that takes place on the streets. In general, I agree with this.
Someone out of the blue does something vile, you can’t just blame the city for it.
I see this situation differently though. The city know of this guy, let him go, wouldn’t follow ICE’s guidelines. They are directly responsible for the acts he committed because they didn’t do their duty.
You may still be right, but when statutes are addressed and the city ignored them and this woman died, I’m not sure the general “blameless” rule will be deemed to apply.
As you say, we’ll see.
Do you think a school would be held blameless if they hired a known sexual predator of children, and he killed a child?
Seems to me it’s the same level of negligence here.
Well said!
I'm correct.
Not right.
It isn't by any stretch of the imagination right.
A fully agree with you.