Posted on 07/03/2015 4:40:06 AM PDT by expat_panama
David Stockman Shock Blog: The Real Unemployment Rate Is 42.9%
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3306261/posts
OK, we're supposed to have the day off but I couldn't resist. fwiw, smart traders took the weekend off yesterday (unchanged, lower volume) so HAPPY 4TH JULY WEEKEND!!!
tx! Heard rush mentioning it but econ’s not Rush’s forte...
Greece + ExtortionCare = U.S.
Have a great holiday.
From BLS
Biggest factor would be females not in the labor force. Can you imagine that.. one spouse working was enough to support a family and pay off the mortgage -- it wasn't just in the movies.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
These tables can be obtained here: go to Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Requires Java. Make your selections. I asked for quarterly data and took the fourth (or last available) quarter annualized data from each table.
But David Stockman forte is the economy. Here is the article Rush mentioned.
The Warren Buffett EconomyWhy Its Days Are Numbered (Part 4)
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/the-warren-buffett-economy-why-its-days-are-numbered-part-4/
Quote from article:
“At the present time, there are 210 million adult Americans between the ages of 16 and 68to take a plausible measure of the potential work force. That amounts to 420 billion potential labor hours, if we accept the convention that all adults are at least theoretically capable of holding a full-time job (2,000 hours/year) and pulling their share of societys need for production and work effort.
By contrast, during 2014 only 240 billion hours were actually supplied to the US economy, according to the BLS estimates. Technically, therefore, there were 180 billion unemployed labor hours, meaning that the real unemployment rate was 42.9%, not 5.5%!”
Unfortunately, with the real unemployment rate at 42%, this discussion rivals global warming arguments, using the wrong numbers in the premise destroys the reason for the argument. Our government lies equally on employment and global warming. I’m an “Unemployment Denier” and proud of it.
Stockman is correct. Rush did an analysis of his 42.9 % number the other day and said there is no number coming out of Obama’s BLS that is not a lie. There are 94 million unemployed people in the US. The media simply refuse to report the bad news. This is why interest rates remain so low and inflation non-existent - the economy is in the ditch. GDP was negative in the first quarter and I predict will be negative for the quarter just ended June 30.
unrelated thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3307278/posts?page=1
David Stockman Shock Blog: The Real Unemployment Rate Is 42.9%.....Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 30, 2015Part-Time Jobs Surge By 161,000; Full-Time Jobs Tumble By 349,000
Since 2007 The US Has Lost 1.4 Million Manufacturers, Gained 1.4 Million Waiters And Bartenders
Factory Orders Scream Recession: Annual Drop Biggest Since 2008
223k jobs? Well, even if I believed that number - which, coming from bammy’s administration I don’t - that doesn’t keep up with the roughly 238k people the US population grew by in that same month.
I think from our personal experiences we all know that the job market stinks. It has probably dominated the discussion at holiday dinner tables for the past 7 years.
According to my calculations (+200K jobs, -400K in workforce) that comes to 1 step forward, 2 steps back.
But what do I know?
Let’s amplify the GRRRRRRREAT NEWS that ”THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FELL”.
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! (only about 200 years old)
Everything about socialism is sham and affectation. - 23.11 Ch23 Evil; Economic Harmonies; Bastiat
What did the students learn this year upon graduation from elementary school, high school, college, Indoctrination U?
More recently (1963)...
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism
20. Infiltrate the press.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV...
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
It takes some villains to raze a republic?
Commenting on the "jobless" recovery an Oct 17th 2003 article in Morgan Stanley's Global Stephen Roach wrote of "Imported Productivity" and "income leakage" vis-à-vis the business cycle recovery (the one starting in late 2001) compared to recoveries of the past.
"The gap between the current cycle and the norm of earlier cycles works out to a shortfall of about $320 billion in real terms, or 4.4% of the current level of real disposable personal income..."Sourcing demand through low-cost, offshore labor input has become an increasingly important tactic to enhance the operating efficiency of US businesses... the American workforce is not sharing the benefits."
Scream "Protectionist!" all you want but huge numbers of jobs going off shore and 24 million foreign workers here should be considered.
Bu that does not let Obama off the hook.
If you are willing to look around a wall of numbers you can see that under Obama the economy is even worse than "the mess Bush left." Though some of the millions of jobs lost while our health care system destruction had priority some of those jobs have been replaced with part-time and temp jobs. Compare current president and past presidents using federal government economic data.
You know a lot (witness post scrutinizing title) as does every FReeper on this thread.
The amplification of the knowledge is drowned out by the Marxist megaphones and left unprocessed by their deaf drones.
Thanks for posting.
Perhaps Obamacare can “take care of” some of those older folks (slackers) that are pushing the labor participation rate down. The BLS could send an email (via the Hillaryous Clinton server) to the VA, too.
We Grubered some folks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.