Posted on 07/01/2015 11:32:39 PM PDT by John S Mosby
Dennis Miller Live S08 E07 March 2 2001 Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens correctly characterizes (throughout the segment) the Clinton grifting couple. WARNING-this is an HBO show, foul language and sophisticated, accurate descriptions of how nasty these two are, by people who knew and know. Prescient.
Beginning at time signature 22:17 Hitchens talks about Billy Boy moving back to blacks (like the current church burning non-events of today) into Harlem, and further how it is Hillary who is after the money and always was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4Z2XEYAIbo
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
This is during the Mary Jo White NYC prosecutor time period, in March of 2001. The 9/11 conspiracy world wide was well under way- 6 months before the 9/11 attacks, which the Clinton's did nothing to prevent, what with the firewall against intel sharing, created by Jamie Gorelick, most recently resigned from Fannie Mae having ripped that agency off. Democrats- a national criminal conspiracy that continues regardless who is in office-a way of life, while real Americans suffer.
The Clinton’s are the floaters in the liberal toilet...
They are ALL just like them only most don’t float..
When a liberal(democrat/rino) smiles check your pockets..
Tolerating them is a mistake.. some are contagious...
They are like the average German that joined the Reich..
Deadly.. sneaky.. and ultimately snitch’s and moles..
Treating them like normal people can get you hurt in some respect..
Mark them.. be wary of them... YES; all of them..
Triple gins, anyone?
Esophageal cancer. He died about a year after announcing it.
I miss him. He could really understand how the world was changing and articulate it.
Me, too. Except for his negative views on Sarah Palin and the Tea Party. And his vote for obammy.
But I still miss him.
That is the year that Donald Trump switched to the democrat party.
Votes for obamaumao, why? And then repeatedly describes obamaumao, after his celebration speech— “a megalomaniacal narcissist”.
So, a puzzling brilliantly eloquent personage. Booze, smoking, dipping baccy and other risk factors killed him.
He was a quasi-old style liberal, who self styled himself as a socialist. Oddly, his position on islamofascism was couched in his atheism, even while the religious/statist national allies responded to it, to his cheering. So, in that (Salman Rushdie defense aside) he was a statist socialist, without sovereign alliegance... a world socialist, who yet did not like Hitler or Stalin or Lenin.
And loved Thomas Jefferson as the polymath Jefferson was.
Votes for obamaumao, why? And then repeatedly describes obamaumao, after his celebration speech— “a megalomaniacal narcissist”.
So, a puzzling brilliantly eloquent personage. Booze, smoking, dipping baccy and other risk factors killed him.
He was a quasi-old style liberal, who self styled himself as a socialist. Oddly, his position on islamofascism was couched in his atheism, even while the religious/statist national allies responded to it, to his cheering. So, in that (Salman Rushdie defense aside) he was a statist socialist, without sovereign alliegance... a world socialist, who yet did not like Hitler or Stalin or Lenin.
And loved Thomas Jefferson as the polymath Jefferson was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.