Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Wow, you really are a drunk, aren't you?

I said, "Donald Trump who helped the campaigns of Pelosi and Reid in 2006 which in turn helped make Obamacare possible

Let me put this in terms even an idiot can understand.

I just HELPED my nephew purchase a car. I have not a doubt in my mind he would have gotten one w/o my assistance.

I also believe Pelosi would have been reelected w/o clown Trump's assistance.

I also believe Reid would have been reelected w/o clown Trump's assistance.

And I also believe Obamacare would have passed w/o Trump assisting Pelosi and Reid.

You said I, "made it clear you don’t think Obamacare could have become law without Trump’s actions."

That's just not true and you know it.

As for your comment that I am a big mouth, bite me you lying arrogant little prick. I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, considering maybe you have a drinking problem, which I still believe you do.

Let's review, shall we?

You support the circus sideshow liberal who supported Pelosi and Reid.

You support the liberal who also supports amnesty "as long as they are productive".

You support the liberal who supports banning those nasty assault weapons.

You support the liberal period.

Later, drunk.

72 posted on 07/01/2015 3:43:10 PM PDT by South40 ("I probably identify more as a democRAT" ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: South40
Wow, you really are a drunk, aren't you?

This is what your actions on Trump have garnered you.  This is how low you will go to avoid admitting how deranged you sound to others.  Just keep telling yourself it's others South40.  That way you don't need to take a look at yourself.  

At this point anyone who cares to know what your true concerns with illegal immigration and reason trade are, knows those concerns don't exist.

Now you even have to tell yourself I'm a drunk, so you don't have to look in the mirror.  


I said, "Donald Trump who helped the campaigns of Pelosi and Reid in 2006 which in turn helped make Obamacare possible

Let me put this in terms even an idiot can understand.

I don't think you can do that, becuase so far you still don't understand yourself.  You see, you have to have more brains than an idiot to set an idiot straight.

I just HELPED my nephew purchase a car. I have not a doubt in my mind he would have gotten one w/o my assistance.

If you din't think Trump was vitally integral in the passage of Obamacare, you wouldn't have gone out of your way to tie him to it?  If it was of no consequence in your mind, you would have taken a pass on even mentioning it.   By mentioning him in conjunction with it, you're implkication was that he was integral to it's passage.  I didn't post anything here about you helping your nephew get a car.  I don't really care if you helped him or not.

I also believe Pelosi would have been reelected w/o clown Trump's assistance.

But that's not what you posted.  You didn't post that she would have made it without him.  You posted that he helped her get re-elected.  Then you said she and Reid got Obamacare passed.  The implication was that Trump was integrally connected to the passage of Obamacare.  All your squealing when I press you on the point, is the result of squirming because you don't like getting called in your nonsensical posts.

I also believe Reid would have been reelected w/o clown Trump's assistance.

Then why go to the trouble of tying Trump to Reid and Reid to Obamacare?  You wanted to have your cake and eat it too.  Well enjoy.  I'm serving it to you on a platter.

And I also believe Obamacare would have passed w/o Trump assisting Pelosi and Reid.

Excpet that's not what you took time to think up and post is it?  You were so desperate to trash Trump, that you tied him to Pelosi and Reid and them to Obamacare is if the end result was Trump's accomplishment.  It wasn't was it.  So why did you think up and post this ridiculous screed?

You said I, "made it clear you don’t think Obamacare could have become law without Trump’s actions."

Then why post that Trimp was directly connected to Obamacare if that's not what you believed?  You didn't believe it anymore than I do, yet you posted away thinking you'd slip that B. S. in.  Didn't work so swell did it.

That's just not true and you know it.

LOL, then why did you post that?  You posted the linkage and pathway from Trump to Obamacare, and now you're denying it was supposed to mean anything.  That's just illogical.

As for your comment that I am a big mouth, bite me you lying arrogant little prick. I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, considering maybe you have a drinking problem, which I still believe you do.

Aww, you poor fella.  You got your own words dished back at you, and now you're name calling because of it.  I asked you days ago to tone it down a bit, think about what you were doing.  You wouldn't have any of that.  Now you're still making preposterous connections and trying to extrapolate meaning from them, unless you're cornered on it.  And then you deny deny deny.  B.S.

You can believe anything you like about me personally.  We've already seen what un unhinged moron you are.  You don't have the man card sufficient to admit Trump was right on target with his comments.  Instead you jump out of the woodwork like the Republicans did when they called Buchanan the next Hitler in 1996.  I don't care for that type of politics.  If you disagree with Trump's immigration and trade comments, explain why.  This idiotic character assassination game is less than childish.

You haven't revealed one thing I didn't know about Trump before this.  You have revealed plenty about yourself.  Stop it!
 

Let's review, shall we?

Oh yes, lets...

You support the circus sideshow liberal who supported Pelosi and Reid.

I support his announced policy, and I have asked you to stop with the character assassination tactics.  It is not unreasoned to want Trump's comments to play center stage long enough to get other cadidates to move in that direction.  If I never vote for the man, I could are less.  You wetting yourself in public isn't improving the sitaution one iota.  You're just embarrassing yourself here.

You support the liberal who also supports amnesty "as long as they are productive".

You support the liberal who supports banning those nasty assault weapons.

Please link me to a place where I endorsed his comments on either of these two subjects.

You support the liberal period.

I support good policy, and so far you haven't been man enough to agree with Trump's comments on illegal immigration and trade.  On the reverse, I have said he is problematic and I don't agree with him on everything.  Do you see a difference?

Undoubtedly not..


Later, drunk.

LOL  What a very powerful counter-argument.  South40, on this one you're living up to your name.  You're in the tulies...

73 posted on 07/01/2015 4:26:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Why are you accusing DoughtyOne of a drinking problem? His posts seem well written and thought out. Nothing in them indicates that he is drunk. Can you not just disagree with him and move on instead of hurling unfounded insults?


74 posted on 07/01/2015 4:26:27 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson