Posted on 06/30/2015 6:52:54 PM PDT by ConservativeTeen
Over the weekend, Fox News anchor Julie Banderas gave a pretty passionate defense of gay marriage in response to a viewer question about why the American people shouldn’t be able to vote on it.
Banderas said, “I’m a married woman. I have… a ring on my finger. I never asked anyone to vote on whether or not I had the right to do this.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
I am so glad we ditched cable and dish. I love not being part lf ‘the popular clique’.
Seriously.
What about parent and child marriage? Brother-sister? What about two 14 year olds? A 40 year old man and 14 year old boy?
Because you BLASTED TWIT, it was a MARRIAGE! ! How dense are these people????
“I never asked anyone to vote on whether or not I had the right to do this”
Well why doesn’t a mother marry her son? That has never been voted on either. It’s just common sense. If people of the same sex were naturally meant to marry how would people pro-create?
Marriage is a binding, exclusive union between a man and a women that is consecrated before God.
Gay “marriage” is not even intended to be binding; the two gays I know who have claimed to be married have both divorced in the past three years. One twice, and the other I think three times (hard to tell; I know of one divorce, and the others may just have been name hyphenation changes).
Gay “marriage” is not exclusive; the best statistics I know of show that 19% of married heterosexuals have committed adultery at least once, while 88% of “married” gay men have committed adultery.
Gay marriage is, by definition, not between a man and a woman, which is why it will never have any meaningful connection to real marriage.
Gay “marriage” is an act of open defiance against God’s word.
I have read about a lot of reported “marriages” that I did not consider real. The Bill and Hillary marriage is not real. The actress marrying for the fifth time is probably not real. Jennifer Lopez and Cris Judd marrying for 50 days and then divorcing were not in a real marriage. And no gay “marriage” has ever been or will ever be real.
tells me that shes a fag hag....it all kinda turns her on. sicko.
Never “asked”, perhaps - but it was voted on. Someone put marriage laws on the books to create the licensing system - if she is referring to filing a piece of paper with the clerk. But no one could vote away same-sex “couples” from holding a ceremony and putting rings on each others fingers and declaring themselves “married”, either. They were perfectly free to do so.
Her comments make absolutely no sense, but the left will go ga-ga over it because it “sounds” good even if makes absolutely no logical sense.
So if I put a ring in an orangutan, does that make it “married?”
How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg?
Answer? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it one.
With all due respect... she may be attractive, but she is a moron.
What will this do to pinochle, now that a “Marriage” can be a pair of Queens?
amazing how quick the worm turns isn’t it. Fox will lead the lynch mobs.
I refuse to accept their perversion of the language, both words are inaccurate. I thing we should re-name the concept. Something not so....happy.
How about something like:
Bitch-hitch.
FFOXNEWS
Ted Cruz 2016. I stand by his positions and agree with his sentiments.
Think (I wasn’t thinking)
LOL! My Mom always said that. :) Well son ;), it means a really really gosh darn long time ago... LOL.
Even though I reckon coons don't live all that long. ;)
btw al baby, I'm sure you knew what that meant. You have an interesting sense of humor. :) I tried to keep my answer in the same spirit, but I probably failed... :)
Of course no one voted on her marriage, because her marriage was (is) normal. That’s the difference. Gay “marriage” is something new. Nevertheless, I understand her point of view that this is a civil rights issue, i.e. “equality” and all that jazz even though I don’t agree. Let’s just see how ardently she supports my civil right to freely exercise my religion. If she’s truly keen on civil rights, she should support free exercise of religion, property rights, and freedom of association, right?
the irony about all of these liberal women who flaunt their friendships with gay men and their support of LBGTQRSTUVWXYZ rights is...
...their gay male friends actually hate them and probably talk badly about them behind their backs.
http://guardianlv.com/2014/05/the-will-and-grace-myth-do-most-gay-men-secretly-hate-women/
Beautiful loser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.