Okay. That changes my reaction. By the time I'd made my first post to you (in response to you saying "idiotic" to "Using suppression of First Amendment rights...LOL!"), I'd seen and skimmed the complaint, and I mistook your remark as coming from a person who thought the lawsuit (not the spin to the press) was "using suppression of First Amendment rights."
I was merely trying to inform you - but now I understand there was no need to do so.
Looks like we’re on the same page, although I at first interpreted your “LOL” as an endorsement of the Donald’s legal acumen, as if he’d somehow devised some unassailable constitutional argument. Sorry about the misinterpretation, but around here, well...you know.