To: SoConPubbie
Reagan’s coattails weren’t that big. And given the numbers already in place a GOP winner in ‘16 probably won’t have big coattails either (there just aren’t many seat TOO gain). And setting GOP policy (especially with a uni-party) is frankly meaningless.
I’m not saying give up. I’m saying find a better plan. Because there is a guarantee this plan will fail.
I also noticed you skipped the 4th, and honestly most important, question:
Where is the proof retention voting has ever actually fixed a judiciary?
66 posted on
06/30/2015 12:48:32 PM PDT by
discostu
(In fact funk's as old as dirt)
To: discostu
Reagans coattails werent that big. And given the numbers already in place a GOP winner in 16 probably wont have big coattails either (there just arent many seat TOO gain). And setting GOP policy (especially with a uni-party) is frankly meaningless.
You don't know that. It's a supposition.
Furthermore, Reagan was down 30% to Carter after the Primaries and then went on to thoroughly trounce him.
Anything can happen in politics.
68 posted on
06/30/2015 12:50:00 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson