Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Reagan’s coattails weren’t that big. And given the numbers already in place a GOP winner in ‘16 probably won’t have big coattails either (there just aren’t many seat TOO gain). And setting GOP policy (especially with a uni-party) is frankly meaningless.

I’m not saying give up. I’m saying find a better plan. Because there is a guarantee this plan will fail.

I also noticed you skipped the 4th, and honestly most important, question:
Where is the proof retention voting has ever actually fixed a judiciary?


66 posted on 06/30/2015 12:48:32 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
Reagan’s coattails weren’t that big. And given the numbers already in place a GOP winner in ‘16 probably won’t have big coattails either (there just aren’t many seat TOO gain). And setting GOP policy (especially with a uni-party) is frankly meaningless.

You don't know that. It's a supposition.

Furthermore, Reagan was down 30% to Carter after the Primaries and then went on to thoroughly trounce him.

Anything can happen in politics.
68 posted on 06/30/2015 12:50:00 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson