[discostu]

I didn’t put forth any rules. I simply said what is. This won’t pass. And judicial retention:
http://216.36.221.170/ajs/publications/Judicature_PDFs/905/aspin_905.pdf

historically runs between 75 and 80%, thus clearly showing it clearly doesn’t fix an out of control judiciary.

There’s nothing wrong with being against things that have a multi-decade proven track record of abject failure. It’s the attitude of ignoring previous results that’s dangerous. I’m not looking for guaranteed success, I’m looking to AVOID guaranteed failure. And an amendment that will NOT pass and will NOT accomplish anything if it somehow does pass is a guaranteed failure.

[SoConPubbie]

There’s nothing wrong with being against things that have a multi-decade proven track record of abject failure. It’s the attitude of ignoring previous results that’s dangerous. I’m not looking for guaranteed success, I’m looking to AVOID guaranteed failure. And an amendment that will NOT pass and will NOT accomplish anything if it somehow does pass is a guaranteed failure.

And your remedy of just beating Hillary does nothing to solve the problem unless the person who becomes President is someone like Ted Cruz, willing to fight the status quo of the uni-party, the GOP-E, and the Democrats.

Your approach has failure written all over it, if you really want to solve this problem.