[Adder]

He is correct

He’s not correct in Oregon or Colorado or New Mexico....
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/12/12/christian-baker-willing-to-go-to-jail-for-declining-gay-wedding-cake/
http://www.oregonlive.com/gresham/index.ssf/2013/09/gresham_bakery_that_refused_to.html
http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2013/august/nm-supreme-court-photographers-cant-refuse-gay-weddings.html

He speaks BS.

[mumblypeg]

You’re right about the current situation re: Oregon, Colorado, NM. I’m familiar with those cases. What I’m trying to say is that I believe he is correct in principle, and that the principle he is using is a distinction between people and activity or events. IMO this distinction should have been applied to the 3 cases. If these cases are appealed, and this distinction is applied at the appellate level, then the current decisions should be overturned, hopefully.
You’re right though, what should be, isn’t, right now.