Well, the majority of SCOTUS disagreed with your interpretation. So what can you do now?
The way I see it, any congress in future in conjunction with the president can overturn the entire Obamacare law without any need for SCOTUS to interpret nuances within it.
I can’t believe you just used Justice Roberts and the other 4 lunkheads on the court to try to make your point. When I agree with Scalia and Thomas and disagree with Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Breyer and Kagan - I know I have it EXACTLY right.
It wasn’t my “interpretation” they disagreed with, they disagreed with plain english.
You obviously don’t understand the history of that portion of the law. It was inserted specifically to put conservative governors in jeopardy, because any who refused to create an exchange, losing the subsidies would anger the voting public.
Either address my arguments or concede defeat. “Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah - 4 commie justices and one sell-out disagree with you...” is not an argument.