Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: SeekAndFind
So they consider the cost and do it again. Pyrrhic victory.
To: SeekAndFind
Nothing an Executive Order can’t fix.
Not to worry.
3 posted on
06/29/2015 8:38:27 AM PDT by
Paulie
(America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
To: SeekAndFind
He’s won plenty and we, as a nation, have lost plenty. Not enough for him. He’ll make up for it.
4 posted on
06/29/2015 8:41:29 AM PDT by
albie
To: SeekAndFind
Don't mean a damn thing. King Obama is currently America's dictator and will ignore the SC.
To: SeekAndFind
“The Supreme Court handed Obama a significant loss on one of his biggest environmental initiatives”
Like he cares...he got everything ELSE he wanted
6 posted on
06/29/2015 8:45:57 AM PDT by
SMARTY
("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
To: SeekAndFind
I am surprised Roberts didn’t swing and sway. He swings both ways; and often swings left when his vote will make a difference.
7 posted on
06/29/2015 8:46:17 AM PDT by
GilesB
To: SeekAndFind
Obama will simply ignore it, but we MUST allow gay marriage...it's the law.
10 posted on
06/29/2015 8:47:47 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
To: SeekAndFind
![](https://shariaunveiled.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/obama-who-cares.jpg)
"As IF I really care...I'll re-write the rules, delete a paragraph, and add a few caveats. Better yet, I'll have momma Valerie call a few of the investors in these big power companies. No problem. If I can't regulate the American people into energy poverty, I'll have big business "voluntarily" do it. Just like my Death Panels, support for homosexual behaviour, and illegals aliens."
To: SeekAndFind
The horse is already out of the gate on this one. The power plants and coal mines are already being shut down.
12 posted on
06/29/2015 8:51:54 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(I am feeling much better now.)
To: SeekAndFind
As somebody pointed out yesterday, the REALLY important thing about this week's decisions is that there is NEVER a single doubt about how Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg will vote.
They don't even need to read the briefs. They are there to vote, and that's what they do.
13 posted on
06/29/2015 8:53:11 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
To: SeekAndFind
“JUSTICE KAGAN, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR join, dissenting.”.
As usual, the four hard-left justices voted the leftist position without any consideration for the Constitution or for the rule of law. I no longer have any respect for the Supreme Court, so I expected that politicized result.
14 posted on
06/29/2015 8:54:09 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: SeekAndFind
They did consider the costs and they determined that the costs would cause the power plants to shut down.
18 posted on
06/29/2015 9:01:38 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(A free society cannot let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous Islamists.)
To: SeekAndFind
Notice how the country club Justices rule for big business when it involves their profit and loss and how they do not rule for ordinary conservative values when it does not effect the corporate bottom line. Does that tell you something about the country club GOPE rino wing?
21 posted on
06/29/2015 9:39:28 AM PDT by
amnestynone
(A big government conservative is just a corporatist who is not paying enough taxes.)
To: SeekAndFind
Isn’t mercury poisonoius?
To: SeekAndFind
I suppose the Supreme Soviet ruled this way just to try and placate the Conservatives. No sale.
To: SeekAndFind
The ruling doesn't matter. Obama will just ignore it like he always does if he doesn't agree with it.
It's nice to be King, no?
27 posted on
06/29/2015 10:19:50 AM PDT by
Gritty
(The wicked strut freely about when what is vile is honored among men - Psalm 12:8)
To: SeekAndFind
Goes to show that you can always count on four of the justices to always be on the “loser” side,no matter what the case is or the will of the general public. There are many cases they should have recused themselves on if they had any decency.
28 posted on
06/29/2015 10:23:50 AM PDT by
oldtech
To: SeekAndFind
What? They didn't write
Congress The EPA passed the
Affordable Care Act pollution rules for power plants to improve
health insurance markets energy producers, not to destroy them. If at all possible we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter,
and then just rewrite the pollution rules?
-PJ
29 posted on
06/29/2015 10:30:56 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: SeekAndFind
Why is Business Insider running a picture of coal power plant in
Germany with this story on EPA rules on American coal plants?
-PJ
30 posted on
06/29/2015 10:34:56 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: SeekAndFind
Yes, the EPA has already gotten most of what the EnviroLobby wanted, BUT this is still a victory when you consider what the results of a reverse ruling would have been. This is a ruling FOR limitation of administrative rule making as opposed to imperial-type bureaucrat governance. This may have an influence on the current EPA “Waters” vs “Navigable Waters” overreach.
I hope!
31 posted on
06/29/2015 10:39:31 AM PDT by
SES1066
(Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson