Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court handed Obama a significant loss on one of his biggest environmental initiatives
Business Insider ^ | 06/29/2015 | BRETT LOGIURATO

Posted on 06/29/2015 8:36:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2015 8:36:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So they consider the cost and do it again. Pyrrhic victory.


2 posted on 06/29/2015 8:38:24 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing an Executive Order can’t fix.

Not to worry.


3 posted on 06/29/2015 8:38:27 AM PDT by Paulie (America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s won plenty and we, as a nation, have lost plenty. Not enough for him. He’ll make up for it.


4 posted on 06/29/2015 8:41:29 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Don't mean a damn thing. King Obama is currently America's dictator and will ignore the SC.
5 posted on 06/29/2015 8:43:26 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The Supreme Court handed Obama a significant loss on one of his biggest environmental initiatives”

Like he cares...he got everything ELSE he wanted


6 posted on 06/29/2015 8:45:57 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am surprised Roberts didn’t swing and sway. He swings both ways; and often swings left when his vote will make a difference.


7 posted on 06/29/2015 8:46:17 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

Notice once again how the decision came down — 5 to 4.

This Republic is hanging by a thread with 2 INCONSISTENT Justices deciding depending on which side of the bed they happen to wake up that morning.


8 posted on 06/29/2015 8:47:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Exactly what I was thinking. The issue should be why does the EPA get this power? These rules should go through congress and then signed into law via the President. The EPA and the Courts are circumventing congress.


9 posted on 06/29/2015 8:47:33 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama will simply ignore it, but we MUST allow gay marriage...it's the law.
10 posted on 06/29/2015 8:47:47 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

"As IF I really care...I'll re-write the rules, delete a paragraph, and add a few caveats. Better yet, I'll have momma Valerie call a few of the investors in these big power companies. No problem. If I can't regulate the American people into energy poverty, I'll have big business "voluntarily" do it. Just like my Death Panels, support for homosexual behaviour, and illegals aliens."

11 posted on 06/29/2015 8:50:28 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The horse is already out of the gate on this one. The power plants and coal mines are already being shut down.
12 posted on 06/29/2015 8:51:54 AM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As somebody pointed out yesterday, the REALLY important thing about this week's decisions is that there is NEVER a single doubt about how Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg will vote.

They don't even need to read the briefs. They are there to vote, and that's what they do.

13 posted on 06/29/2015 8:53:11 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“JUSTICE KAGAN, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR join, dissenting.”.

As usual, the four hard-left justices voted the leftist position without any consideration for the Constitution or for the rule of law. I no longer have any respect for the Supreme Court, so I expected that politicized result.


14 posted on 06/29/2015 8:54:09 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
"The issue should be why does the EPA get this power?"

Congress voted to give up the power to be the issuer of environmental regulations back in the 1970's. Cannot have politics interfere with the protection of mother Gaia you know.

15 posted on 06/29/2015 8:56:18 AM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Correct assessment.


16 posted on 06/29/2015 8:59:26 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

That shouldn’t bind future congress though. The executive branch needs to be constrained. Reminds me of the fall of the roman empire when Caesar took all the power and the Senate was just a club for rich men.


17 posted on 06/29/2015 9:00:56 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They did consider the costs and they determined that the costs would cause the power plants to shut down.


18 posted on 06/29/2015 9:01:38 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society cannot let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous Islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; buckalfa
"The issue should be why does the EPA get this power?"

In this particular case Congress amended the clean air act in 1990 to regulate sulfur, Mercury and other toxics.

The got the sulfur regulations pretty quick but they have been working on mercury and other toxics for 25 years. Clinton moved the ball downfield, Bush moved it the other direction, and now Obama. You can do a google search on history of mercury and other toxics and find all the milestones.

Quite a few states have already implemented this. And since this was implemented, possibly others will follow thru even though SCOTUS shot it down.

19 posted on 06/29/2015 9:19:01 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

> These rules should go through congress and then signed into law via the President. The EPA and the Courts are circumventing congress.

No law passed by Congress created the EPA; it was an executive order.


20 posted on 06/29/2015 9:19:52 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Political Correctness is Supression of Free Speech. Thank the Commies for Political Correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson