Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rules against EPA on pollution rules
Washington Examiner ^ | 6-29-2015 | John Siciliano

Posted on 06/29/2015 7:44:32 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against Environmental Protection Agency pollution rules for power plants Monday, in a blow to President Obama's environmental agenda.

The EPA rules in question regulate hazardous air pollutants and mercury from coal- and oil-fired power plants, known as the MATS regulations. The regulations went into effect April 16. The utility industry argues that the rules cost them billions of dollars to comply and that EPA ignored the cost issue in putting the regulations into effect.

Many of the companies have either made the investments or closed power plants to comply. If the investments necessary to upgrade a plant to comply with the regulation aren't justified when considering the operational costs, revenues earned and other factors, then the decision is made to retire it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: against; coal; energy; epa; epaoutofcontrol; globalwarminghoax; popefrancis; powerplants; romancatholicism; rules; sc; scotusepa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
YES!!!!
1 posted on 06/29/2015 7:44:32 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

It will be ignored.

So, no victory.


2 posted on 06/29/2015 7:45:36 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Why were the power companies required to comply while the court case was going on?


3 posted on 06/29/2015 7:47:16 AM PDT by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

One small victory...but not to be ignored!


4 posted on 06/29/2015 7:47:47 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

We are just one (or 2) justices away from leftist destruction. The next president will make this go one way or the other for many years.


5 posted on 06/29/2015 7:48:40 AM PDT by umgud (When under attack, victims want 2 things; God & a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The ruling only states that costs must be a consideration. If the EPA consideration order is all grey-area and not strictly defined it will be twisted to mean “Ya, we looked at it and considered it and we consider it moot”


6 posted on 06/29/2015 7:49:09 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

It’s a good thing that our Republican heroes in Congress have starved the EPA of money and voted to close it down in order to halt its abuses.

What? Oh. Never mind.


7 posted on 06/29/2015 7:50:17 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

FINALLY!
Someone in government who’s not afraid of the liars at the EPA


8 posted on 06/29/2015 7:50:24 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

One out of three is still a failing grade.


9 posted on 06/29/2015 7:51:32 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

or, yes we considered cost, and we know it will put you out of business, tough luck, COMPLY!


10 posted on 06/29/2015 7:52:04 AM PDT by HoosierWordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Obama will take care of this little “problem” with his pen and his phone.


11 posted on 06/29/2015 7:52:56 AM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

2 steps forward, one step back is a win for the left.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 7:53:21 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Unmutual and Disharmonious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: exit82

One out of four.


13 posted on 06/29/2015 7:53:42 AM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joshua c
Why were the power companies required to comply while the court case was going on?

Because it's comrade Obama, and what he says, goes.

14 posted on 06/29/2015 7:55:39 AM PDT by wastedyears (Iron Maiden - The Book of Souls, out Sept 4th, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Go Big Business!


15 posted on 06/29/2015 7:56:01 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoosierWordsmith

The regulators will change the place of 1 comma and claim its a new regulation and do what they wish.

The Fed.GOV has become untethered from the Constitution. The final blow was the 2 cases in last week that the former Article III court called “supreme” decided to usurp the powers of the the Congress (Article I) and Congress (Article V) and the States (Article V) by creating legislative language not in law, and creating a constitutional power not given in the Constitution.


16 posted on 06/29/2015 7:59:24 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS.


17 posted on 06/29/2015 8:01:02 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Just remember. The only reason we won this is because Kennedy wasn’t PMS.


18 posted on 06/29/2015 8:04:15 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Change the Defense of Marriage Act to the Defense of Holy Matrimony Act. Game, set match.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ..

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

19 posted on 06/29/2015 8:04:29 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
Doesn't matter.

Unlike us, Obola has a constitutional right to ignore SCOTUS rulings he doesn't like.

20 posted on 06/29/2015 8:04:37 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson