Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” she didn’t read that part, did she?


2 posted on 06/28/2015 12:20:31 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


7 posted on 06/28/2015 12:21:47 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

What they don’t like, they ignore. They are fixing to separate the boys from the men and the girls from the women with this one.


24 posted on 06/28/2015 12:27:11 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare
In a twist to an old saying: "let them make cakes" - for the gays but not for confederates and other unapproved activities 😵 The only flag to have out now is don't tread on me!!!!!
52 posted on 06/28/2015 12:44:57 PM PDT by keving (We get the government we vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

“I can ‘freely exercise’ but you can’t” is the living and growing meaning of the Constitution that leftists and she did read and understand as the meaning of it.


59 posted on 06/28/2015 12:51:53 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare
“Nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” she didn’t read that part, did she?

Liberals can't really read, Dark. It explains the SCOTUS pretty well.

71 posted on 06/28/2015 12:58:11 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("No social transformation without representation." - Justice Antonin Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare
“Nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” she didn’t read that part, did she?

In Friday's decision, those words were not used ONCE. Usually, an opinion will discuss the merits of both sides of a case, and then detail why the judge or judges chose to rule the way that they did... and in a landmark, long-term battle between two First Amendment clauses, one side of the debate is not even mentioned. This should tell you all that you need to know about how appropriate and just the ruling was.

118 posted on 06/28/2015 2:11:19 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

Just WHAT IS IN THAT KOOLAID?


152 posted on 06/28/2015 7:03:41 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson