In Friday's decision, those words were not used ONCE. Usually, an opinion will discuss the merits of both sides of a case, and then detail why the judge or judges chose to rule the way that they did... and in a landmark, long-term battle between two First Amendment clauses, one side of the debate is not even mentioned. This should tell you all that you need to know about how appropriate and just the ruling was.
It does.
We are close to America’s own “enabling acts”.