Replies

To: DoughtyOne

Somebody on the court is talking to the white house or they wouldn’t have been so clearly prepared for the ruling.

7 posted on 06/27/2015 1:49:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)

To: cripplecreek

Looks like it. Not sure that’s actually bad if they were to remain steadfast to the legality of their actions.

As it stands, not good...

23 posted on 06/27/2015 2:06:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)

To: cripplecreek

Talkers? I give you Ms. Kagan and/or The Wise Latina.

29 posted on 06/27/2015 2:14:21 PM PDT by lee martell (The sa)

To: cripplecreek

Kagan for sure. She was Obama’s solicitor general, she’s on his legal team.

45 posted on 06/27/2015 2:29:10 PM PDT by Boogieman

To: cripplecreek

Somebody on the court is talking to the white house or they wouldn’t have been so clearly prepared for the ruling.

Exactyly. The White House just ‘happened’ to have rainbow lights all ready to go on Friday night?

47 posted on 06/27/2015 2:30:01 PM PDT by usmom

To: cripplecreek

Somebody on the court is talking to the white house or they wouldn’t have been so clearly prepared for the ruling.

No doubt. There had to have been some coordination there. The court took their orders from the WH.

102 posted on 06/27/2015 9:59:55 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794