Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick

I disagree.

It is a total victory for the left.

for most people it will become:

Marriage? What is that? Something from the history books.

great job. not.


32 posted on 06/27/2015 12:29:19 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

Yeah, that’s exactly the problem. The traditional understanding of marriage was just redefined by the federal government. And it will probably get worse since the doors have now been thrown open to polygamy and worse.

I’d love to fight this, but what is the path? An Article V amendment to the Constitution? Then let’s do it. You have some other idea? Then let’s do it. Otherwise, let’s find workarounds at the state level.

I mean, I haven’t thought through all the ins and outs of this, but what Mississippi is doing seems interesting.


48 posted on 06/27/2015 12:37:08 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

state and churches can rebrand the product under a different name.


131 posted on 06/27/2015 1:21:46 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone all iCommentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

Brilliant.
Marriage was always about a Man, and Woman (or vice-versa!) And the Church or Synagogue.
Until government decided it wanted “in.”
BURN BABY BURN


168 posted on 06/27/2015 2:07:00 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson