Posted on 06/27/2015 8:12:51 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
Two of the five votes concerning same sex marriage are totally illegitimate. They were cast by Elenor Kagan and Sonia Sotomayer acting as though they are legal members of the United States Supreme Court. Any challenge to this ruling should include a challenge to their legitimacy as they were appointed by a Usurper, not a legal President.
It's time to take the gloves off and get the courage to confront the evil that is before us. I can prove that Obama is illegal just using the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three and have made this case many times on this forum. The charade has gone on long enough. We the people have the "reset" button in our hands with the Obama eligibility issue and we need to use it.
That the current federal government has declared war on on every one of us cannot be disputed. Obama's weak spot is his legitimacy as a legal President. Attacking it is our nuclear option. Someone please, hit the button.
“Decent people are leaderless and totally demoralized.”
That sadly, is a remarkably accurate statement.
That looks like a picture of 3 mental patients.
I would like to point out the current religious affiliations of each member of the U. S. Supreme Court:
There are six Roman Catholics currently serving on the court (Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas) and three Jews (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagen).
Nary a Protestant Christian.
That the argument I have presented hasn't been legally presented is not my fault. That does not invalidate the argument but just proves what cowards the leaders of this nation, at the federal and state levels have been.
“thanks to Lindsay Graham and Orrin Hatch” and Juan McCain and all the other usual ‘moderate’ GOP-e suspects
For the old guard Gopers here who can’t seem to understand, and are actually hostile to those of us here who are so unhappy with the Grand old party ... this is a damned good reason.
The Democrats wheedle, threaten, filibuster, use terms like the “nuclear option” when the tables are turned: they **fight like tigers** to exclude all judges, at all levels, that don’t pass their political agenda litmus test.
Republicans?
Gay, abortion, subsidies? Partial, slanted, subjective? ... oh pshaw.
“Welcome aboard the federal judicial gravy train, Democrats! Just promise us you’ll try and behave yourselves, OK?”
District court, appellate courts, Supreme Court.
Latest example? Atty General `Eric Holder Jr.’ Keep her out because she’s just another Mini-me with an extreme mindset destructive of the republic?
“Harrumph harrumph! We’ve got our hoity toity jobs and the news organs’ opinions to think of .... “
Your GOP
The Constitution states that whoever receives a majority of the votes of the electors “SHALL BE THE PRESIDENT.” (12th Amendment).
270 electoral votes are a majority and Obama got 365 electoral votes in 2008 and 332 electoral votes in 2012. A Joint Session of Congress meets in January to count and certify those electoral votes and it only takes the written objection of one Representative and one Senator to stop the certification of electoral votes until both Houses of Congress resolve the objection by majority vote with one vote per state in each House.
Obama’s electoral votes were certified without written objection, twice.
If there had ever been a court ruling of ineligibility or a congressional resolution of ineligibility, you would have constitutional ground to stand on. But there has been no such finding. 21 court rulings have declared Obama to be eligible for the position he holds and Congress has sent him hundreds of bills to sign into law and Congress has confirmed hundreds of his nominees.
For example, 113 federal judges nominated by Obama have been confirmed unanimously. The last Obama federal judges to be confirmed are Jill Parrish to the District Court for Utah and Jose Rolando Olvera, Jr. for the Southern District of Texas. They were both confirmed 100-0 on May 21, 2015.
By all means, pursue it if it makes you feel good. It will come to nothing, as it has already come to nothing every time it's been tried.
It should be obvious by now that theoretical legal arguments don't carry any clout with this Court, or with most of the lower courts.
Thankfully, he only has 1 1/2 yrs left
Thankful? not really...’I”bama still has more vengeance to the sinners of the world..that is American white heterosexuals who work for a living and pay for this fool’s dystopian fantasies.
A year and a half is enough time to do even more. Why not he got away with OCommieCare and now queer mirage (marrage).
Sorry,not to thankful.
The legitimate Senate seated the bench bitches (female dogs). Try another approach.
It was a white Anglo-Saxon Roman Catholic heterosexual male named Chief Justice John Roberts who wrote the opinion that instituionalized Obamacare and a white Anglo-Saxon Roman Catholic heterosexual male named Justice Anthony Kennedy who wrote the opinion that institutionalized queer marriage.
Uncle, I feel your pain. It’s done. This country is toast.
We are outnumbered by morons watching american idol.
Depends on the meaning they apply to the words. And it will be applied their way.
Who is John Galt.
white Anglo-Saxon Roman Catholic heterosexual male named Chief Justice John Roberts
Yep,he is a Judas. Definitely more liberal than not.
As to the electoral college results, I account for them as part of the process to becoming President. The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three is part of the process as well and follows the Electoral College portion. A qualification is STILL required. Congress neglecting to do their duty does not make "not qualifying" legal.
At the least, those 2 lesbians should have been made to recuse themselves.
“Theoretical” arguments carry all the clout with this court.
It’s arguments based on logic and reality that don’t do so well.
The President-Elect qualifies under the 20th Amendment when that person’s electoral votes are certified by both Houses of Congress. Obama’s were certified without objection.
Just because it is someone’s personal opinion that Congress didn’t do its job doesn’t make it so.
There have been 226 state and federal court challenges to Obama’s eligibility, 97 state and federal appellate court rulings and 26 appeals to the Supreme Court of the United States. Not one ruling over the last seven years of court challenges has ever found him to be ineligible for the office he holds.
A federal judge who is a former U.S. Marine Corps First Lieutenant who won the Bronze Star and the Purple Heart at the Battle of Khe Sahn in Vietnam ruled in Barnett, Keyes et. al. v Obama, et. al., Judge David O. Carter, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California:
“The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought. Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not initiated impeachment proceedings, and, in fact, the House of Representatives, in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office. See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Congress. (2009) commemorating, by a vote of 378-0 the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating “The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.”—October 29, 2009
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.