Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Walker calls for Constitutional amendment to let states define marriage
Politico ^ | June 26, 2015 | Daniel Strauss

Posted on 06/26/2015 11:20:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Bluewater2015

“Constitution is too darned hard to amend. A shame.”

Well, treaties are too so they created this “fast track authority”, known now as TPA. Maybe we can get this for...nevermind. Let’s just take this crap down and start over. Much easier and something we can get done in our lifetimes.


21 posted on 06/26/2015 11:29:35 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Well, at least ONE person is suggesting this. What happened to the multitude of “libertarians” who said we could just willy-nilly pass a constitutional amendment if courts went too far?

No where to be found, it seems.


22 posted on 06/26/2015 11:29:48 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I think Walker's heart is in the right place, and of course, being a politician, he's ennamoured of political solutions. But the one he proposes won't fly, in light of SCOTUS ruling, which demands uniformity or marriage recognition across all 50 states.

The only way to seriously address the decision is by outright violation of the order.

23 posted on 06/26/2015 11:30:38 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The idea that amendments will save us is ludicrous.

It’s like the high school football team that can’t beat their crosstown rival, so they challenge to local NFL team.

If you can’t do X, how do you think you are going to do X cubed?


24 posted on 06/26/2015 11:30:44 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I like Walker but its a pointless effort.
The Gay Mafia will make sure this never comes up of a vote anywhere.


25 posted on 06/26/2015 11:31:25 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

What I find most intriguing is that progressives are engaged in sawing off the branch they are sitting on.

Their power is largely based on control of the media and courts. The courts’ power derives from the Constitution, for which conservatives have immense respect.

But that devotion is not bottomless. The progressives are doing their best to destroy it, and someday they may succeed. In which case they may have a problem.


26 posted on 06/26/2015 11:33:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience.
That is objectively false. Those who do the oppressing certainly want to live and control where they can. As for the controlled (the masses), they may have the ability to choose between places, but when all of the places coerce action against conscience, the best that can be done is flying under the radar. Anybody who wants to live, has to live somewhere.
27 posted on 06/26/2015 11:34:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Surprisingly principles stand from Walker. Wasn’t expecting it.


28 posted on 06/26/2015 11:36:33 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluewater2015
-- Constitution is too darned hard to amend. --

Piece of cake for SCOTUS. Stroke of the pen, "amended."

29 posted on 06/26/2015 11:37:14 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Never happen.


30 posted on 06/26/2015 11:37:30 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Pray. It's the last arrow in the quiver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

What a joke, Walker is just another political operative trying to find the best lie to fool the weak minded that supports him.


31 posted on 06/26/2015 11:37:43 AM PDT by Souled_Out (Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

The first amendment is dead, the second amendment is regulated, the tenth amendment leaves it up to states, oops that’s ignored routinely


32 posted on 06/26/2015 11:38:20 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
No, he needs to call for states to nullify an obviously illegal abuse of power by the SCOTUS.

If the Fed Courts threaten any state or local official over "gay" marriage, the states need to arrest the judges.

Make Obama try to send in the army to enforce "gay" marriage.

33 posted on 06/26/2015 11:38:37 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluewater2015

Well, the Left seems to get it amended by the courts all the time.


34 posted on 06/26/2015 11:39:20 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Meh, they’ll just declare the amendment “unconstitutional” at this point. Laws mean nothing anymore.”

Walker is talking out his ass. How did all those votes by the people against gay marriage and illegal immigration turn out? A judge always rules for the libs and overturns the vote. The few times they rule in our favor, it magically somehow isn’t binding.

No more Don Quixote. Good call, my friend.


35 posted on 06/26/2015 11:39:59 AM PDT by Luke21 (Go Ted go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage,” Walker said in the statement.

...

I’m not sure an amendment will do any good. It seems like half the court doesn’t care what the Constitution, the dictionary, or any amendments say.


36 posted on 06/26/2015 11:40:14 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Please read through the link I posted to you.


37 posted on 06/26/2015 11:42:14 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Impy

or the west coast falls off face earth


38 posted on 06/26/2015 11:43:05 AM PDT by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why not just have a law (signed by the next GOP president) which takes the whole issue of marriage OUT of the federal government’s reach - and then any state which wants to can do the same? It’s easier that way, as it would not require an amendment.

Yes, some tax and other laws would then have to be re-written - for example, qualifications for filing a joint return would have to be based on some other factor than marriage.

Then, whether or not a “marriage” is recognized is basically up to whatever church is asked to sanctify the marriage and whatever neighbors in the community want to consider whether they will refer to the couple living next door as married.

Isn’t that really the way it should be anyway?


39 posted on 06/26/2015 11:43:57 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Bravo Gov. Walker!


40 posted on 06/26/2015 11:49:06 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson