SCOTUScare and AnythingMarriage prove that the following are irrelevant:
The People
The Legislative Branch
The States
The Constitution
Democracy
A Republican form of government
You say you want a revolution ....
Time to push the reset button and start over. We really havent had a constitution that has been followed as law since at least FDR. And this just finishes completely.
Constitution convention. Call the states together, lets get started.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natures God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
....
Doggone it. Where is the ctrl-alt-del buttons on this government? Who knows where to find it?
I think the Miers may have been an improvement.
Roberts’ almost certainly sided with the dissenters on the homosexual marriage thing ONLY because he knew the other side had the votes to swing it obozo’s way.
And WHY would he do that after saving obozocare TWICE? Here’s a really good reason:
Speculation is rife that obama and his minions KNOW that the Chief Justice VIOLATED THE ADOPTION LAWS OF IRELAND and have used the threat of public disclosure of that to secure FAVORABLE RULINGS from him and those on the court over whom he has some influence. The first such was their ludicrous ruling that Obamacare penalties were a TAX. And the second occurred today, when the court TOTALLY IGNORED THE LANGUAGE OF THE ACA to rule as it did. That tortured ruling has caused numerous legal commentators — Judge Napolitano among them — to opine that words no longer have meanings.
While his brutal murder of the supreme organic law of America goes unnoticed by the leftist (aka COMMUNIST) media, how unseemly would it be to have the CJ of the SCOTUS known as a common scofflaw?
I guess everyone has a price.
Welcome to 1984 and NEWSPEAK!
The link below provides the details.
http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=4301673:Topic:1290701&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Soon the People will demand a King.
The bottom line is that the average man yearns to be ruled. The theory of 1776 has been falsified in our lifetime.
We have been living under the rule of Judges since 1949. It’s time to move on to Kings.
for anyone interested in the video of ted cruz ripping the sc justices a new one- head over to teds site here- heres the video
http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=video&id=2365
Ted said in his speech “If the justices want to be legislators, I invite them to resign their position and run for congress... that is the proper place to write legislation from, not in the supreme court” or something along those lines... “...but one day of faux outrage by the Washington cartel won’t fool the millions of people...They (the people) know that far too many democrats AND republicans are quietly celebrating the court’s decision”
Ted needs to run hammering home the idea that this next election NEEDS to be one where we throw the trash out- throw the bums out of office who REFUSE to uphold law- REFUSE to honor their oath, and wipe clean the slate in BOTH the house and senate, and get this country back on track and restored to the great nation we were BEFORE socialists intentionally destroyed this great nation and the rule of law was thrown out the window!
kennedy cvame out and declared that the constitution ‘does not prohibit gay people from marrying’ or something akin to this
What an asinine statement to make! The constitution doesn’t ban pedophiles from marrying children, people from marrying animals, people from marrying corpses either- yet ALL are illegal Even gay marriage- because ALL are gross deviations from natural law
We no longer have a supreme court to protect us from rogue government- the government is now free to create any law they like and the supreme court will back them up- even rewriting the law in order to make it pass- effectively LEGISLATING fro mthe bench-
This ruling today, and the one yesterday- showed that the supreme court is LAWLESS!
The argument is based on a complete misunderstanding of the Constitution.
Co-Equal Branches of Government
They are no such thing! Congress has ultimate power over both of the other two branches, while they have little or none over it.
That Congress does not choose to exercise its constitutional power because it would be counter-productive to the individual top priority of most congressmen, getting re-elected, doesn’t change the powers granted Congress in the Constitution.
The failure of the attempt to remove A. Johnson from office was in retrospect a disaster for constitutional government. If every fourth or fifth president had been removed from office, we wouldn’t be having idiotic discussions about “co-equal branches.”
In light of this, makes one wonder what exactly is the purpose behind Jade Helm, doesn’t it?
Currently we have a banana republic form of government with a supreme leader, a rubber stamp legislative body and a corrupt court that writes the laws.
Great article as always Steve.