Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS: Marriage dead
6-26-15

Posted on 06/26/2015 7:01:22 AM PDT by markomalley

Ruling just came out 5-4


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: bumbandits; buttpirates; carpetmunchers; drugsdidthis; homosexualagenda; turdburglars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last
To: DoodleDawg
And once more we see the irrational attempt of the lost causers to blame Lincoln for everything up to and including a cloudy day.

No you fool, this is a direct consequence of federal supremacy governing against the will of the people.

In a hundred years (probably less) there will be other childish little big mouths like you arguing that Homosexuals were being mistreated and the federal government needed to step in and protect them because the status quo was immoral, so therefore the FedGov was justified in taking action.

Fed Zilla started with Lincoln and the Civil War. It is but one more ugly truth that you refuse to face.

41 posted on 06/26/2015 7:24:08 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
Fatal blow to Christianity and the U.S. military. Queers rule America. Game over.

Assume crash positions.

42 posted on 06/26/2015 7:25:15 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

Reagan appointed Kennedy, who already had an activists reputation” concerning social issues.


43 posted on 06/26/2015 7:25:52 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Arcanum is brilliant, much more unknown than Humanae Vitae but just as prescient and important, in my opinion. He lays out the danger of conditioning the populace to believe marriage is whatever the civil authorities say it is at any one time. Eventually many will simply accept any possibility, as long as the state accepts it first.

FReegards


44 posted on 06/26/2015 7:26:23 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
No you fool, this is a direct consequence of federal supremacy governing against the will of the people.

You blame it all on Lincoln and I'm the fool.

45 posted on 06/26/2015 7:26:23 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
States simply need, now more than ever, to get out of the marriage business. Period.

This is the same sort of Neville Chamberlain thinking that enabled and empowered Hitler.

Appeasement never works.

46 posted on 06/26/2015 7:26:58 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Let's see how churches will react. Gays might be able to get a civil marriage, but that does not mean that that sham marriage must be performed by a church. I wonder what if any denominations will stand fast and say we do not perform gay marriage in our church? Could this mean that the government will force churches to perform same sex marriages?

For Catholics will the sacrament of marriage now be openly offered to same sex couples? Too bad the pope is spending his time worshipping at the altar of climate change instead of defending marriage.

47 posted on 06/26/2015 7:27:13 AM PDT by The Great RJ (“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

No need to question, we can’t. The end times had to get rolling some time, I believe that we’re witnessing that time.


48 posted on 06/26/2015 7:28:13 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
You blame it all on Lincoln and I'm the fool.

Yes on the latter count.

49 posted on 06/26/2015 7:28:40 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
For Catholics will the sacrament of marriage now be openly offered to same sex couples?

Not just no. *Hell no!*

50 posted on 06/26/2015 7:29:39 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

>>>>>>>>Gays might be able to get a civil marriage, but that does not mean that that sham marriage must be performed by a church.

Yet.

Within months, they’ll demand it. (If the minister signs a marriage license, then it is a public act, remember)

And the courts will force it upon churches. Just watch.


51 posted on 06/26/2015 7:29:46 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What they need to do is refuse.

We need governors to say, “No. This is tyranny. We’ll not implement your stupidity.”

We need legislatures to back up their governors.

Or...


52 posted on 06/26/2015 7:31:00 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Yes on the latter count.

And on the first one as well. Golly gee, how will I every learn to live with the shame of your disapproval?

53 posted on 06/26/2015 7:32:41 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
And on the first one as well. Golly gee, how will I every learn to live with the shame of your disapproval?

Cluelessness has been your shield for a very long time, so I predict it will continue to shield you from the awareness of your own stupidity for awhile longer.

54 posted on 06/26/2015 7:34:02 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That didn’t happen with civil divorce and remarriage, but that wasn’t considered a ‘civil right’ and it was a much saner time litigation-wise.

Punishing faiths for not conducting marriages is certainly no more ridiculous a prediction than telling someone in 1985 ‘gay marriage’ would be legal in every state of the union by 2015.

Freegards


55 posted on 06/26/2015 7:35:44 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
Reagan appointed Kennedy

You are correct. My bad.

56 posted on 06/26/2015 7:35:45 AM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: Our first black, gay, Kenyan, Socialist, Muslim president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

So, when do polygamists and brothers/sisters go to the courthouse for their marriage licenses?


57 posted on 06/26/2015 7:37:14 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obviously not many people are homosexual. I tried fighting the slide by opposing one of the main root causes of societal downfall which is drugs. When a growing number of people lack self respect because they are hooked on drugs then any far leftist agenda becomes not only possible but predictable.

Too bad I wasn’t joined by more people. Instead, for example, there was one poster with “Saint” in his name saying smoking dope is no big deal just like huffing turpentine. Yea really.

Just a pity. Expect more bad things to come.


58 posted on 06/26/2015 7:38:42 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

“Divorce lawyers across America celebrate a windfall.”

Absolutely cogent interpretation of this ruling’s likely impact. As much as this “community” likes to pose as loving, faithful partners, I’d bet that divorce rates go through the roof. I should have gone to law school as I originally planned. Though it must be hard to do my job holding my nose all the time.


59 posted on 06/26/2015 7:39:00 AM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

>>>>>>For Catholics will the sacrament of marriage now be openly offered to same sex couples?

It wouldn’t surprise me if some dissenting priests or deacons sign marriage licenses. It wouldn’t surprise me if some limp wristed bishop refuses to discipline said clergymen. It wouldn’t surprise me if the current Vatican ignores the situation (witness how they react to specific examples of pro abortion politicians receiving communion).

But, no, it won’t ever be recognized as a valid sacrament.


60 posted on 06/26/2015 7:40:01 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson