Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CAluvdubya
Scalia, in his dissent...

Those civil consequences—and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court.

I would say some are... The system of checks and balances in this country places the onus now on congress to fix this.

221 posted on 06/26/2015 7:55:24 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

How can this be overturned or even fixed now though?


235 posted on 06/26/2015 8:01:24 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

To: All
Off topic: I am sitting here watching Susan Estrich on FNC. She looks like an original member of the Adams Family. Man, she looks bad!

This is the face one acquires when you ignore God's laws.

243 posted on 06/26/2015 8:04:17 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (<------- has now left CA for NV, where God and guns have not been outlawed! Cruise with Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson